Back to Search Start Over

How unpredictable is the individual scanning process in socially foraging mammals?

Authors :
Peter J. Jarman
Pierre-Cyril Renaud
Olivier Pays
François-René Favreau
Simon P. Blomberg
Littoral, Environnement, Télédétection, Géomatique (LETG-Angers)
Littoral, Environnement, Télédétection, Géomatique UMR 6554 (LETG)
Université de Caen Normandie (UNICAEN)
Normandie Université (NU)-Normandie Université (NU)-Université d'Angers (UA)-École pratique des hautes études (EPHE)
Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-Université de Brest (UBO)-Université de Rennes 2 (UR2)
Université de Rennes (UNIV-RENNES)-Université de Rennes (UNIV-RENNES)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Institut de Géographie et d'Aménagement Régional de l'Université de Nantes (IGARUN)
Université de Nantes (UN)-Université de Nantes (UN)-Université de Caen Normandie (UNICAEN)
Université de Nantes (UN)-Université de Nantes (UN)
Source :
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 2010, 64 (3), pp.443-454. ⟨10.1007/s00265-009-0860-0⟩
Publication Year :
2009
Publisher :
Springer Science and Business Media LLC, 2009.

Abstract

International audience; In group-forming prey species, theory assumes that individuals within groups should scan independently of one another, with vigilance sequences being relatively unpredictable, making interscan durations highly variable. We attempted to detect any divergence from randomness in the scanning process in three mammalian prey species phylogenetically and geographically separated and exposed to different levels of predation: waterbuck, Kobus ellipsiprymnus defassa, under a high observed predation risk, eastern grey kangaroo, Macropus giganteus, still experiencing occasional predation and European roe deer, Capreolus capreolus, under a very low natural predation risk. Our results revealed that the focal interscan duration increased when the duration of the preceding interscan increased, whatever the studied species and the predation risk that its individuals experienced, and decreased with the preceding scan duration in two species under, respectively, occasional and low predation risks. The exponential distribution was the tested model that fitted the observed distributions of interscan durations least well. We discuss what can trigger non-randomness in scanning, through a non-homogenous Poisson process, at both intra-individual and inter-individual levels, particularly with regard to previous studies that have demonstrated synchronisation of vigilance in such mammals. Our results suggest the need to reconsider any assumption of randomness in scanning in the basic model predicting form and frequency of scanning behaviour by prey species.

Details

ISSN :
14320762 and 03405443
Volume :
64
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....938594840f2b695c3b6e8ba2a312b4bf
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-009-0860-0