Back to Search Start Over

Effect of Nebulized Hypertonic Saline Treatment in Emergency Departments on the Hospitalization Rate for Acute Bronchiolitis

Authors :
Isabelle Claudet
Amélie Gatin
Yves Marot
Philippe Babe
Astrid Vabret
Ralph Epaud
Mathilde Delebarre
Philippe Flahaut
Dominique Ploin
Oussama Charara
Luigi Titomanlio
Jean-Paul Teglas
Pascal Saunier
François Dubos
Jacques Brouard
Vanessa Degas-Bussiere
Géraldine Patteau
Pascale Micheau
Valérie Soussan-Banini
Philippe Minodier
François Angoulvant
Karen Milcent
Thanh-Van Trieu
Abdelilah Tahir
Loïc de Pontual
Amélie Ryckewaert
Cyril Schweitzer
Xavier Bellettre
Henri Panjo
Simon Henry
Pierrick Cros
B. Vrignaud
Delphine Regnard
Vincent Gajdos
Jean Bouyer
Christèle Gras-Le Guen
Source :
JAMA Pediatrics. 171:e171333
Publication Year :
2017
Publisher :
American Medical Association (AMA), 2017.

Abstract

Importance Acute bronchiolitis is the leading cause of hospitalization among infants. Previous studies, underpowered to examine hospital admission, have found a limited benefit of nebulized hypertonic saline (HS) treatment in the pediatric emergency department (ED). Objective To examine whether HS nebulization treatment would decrease the hospital admission rate among infants with a first episode of acute bronchiolitis. Design, Setting, and Participants The Efficacy of 3% Hypertonic Saline in Acute Viral Bronchiolitis (GUERANDE) study was a multicenter, double-blind randomized clinical trial on 2 parallel groups conducted during 2 bronchiolitis seasons (October through March) from October 15, 2012, through April 15, 2014, at 24 French pediatric EDs. Among the 2445 infants (6 weeks to 12 months of age) assessed for inclusion, 777 with a first episode of acute bronchiolitis with respiratory distress and no chronic medical condition were included. Interventions Two 20-minute nebulization treatments of 4 mL of HS, 3%, or 4 mL of normal saline (NS), 0.9%, given 20 minutes apart. Main Outcomes and Measures Hospital admission rate in the 24 hours after enrollment. Results Of the 777 infants included in the study (median age, 3 months; interquartile range, 2-5 months; 468 [60.2%] male), 385 (49.5%) were randomized to the HS group and 387 (49.8%) to the NS group (5 patients did not receive treatment). By 24 hours, 185 of 385 infants (48.1%) in the HS group were admitted compared with 202 of 387 infants (52.2%) in the NS group. The risk difference for hospitalizations was not significant according to the mixed-effects regression model (adjusted risk difference, –3.2%; 95% CI, –8.7% to 2.2%; P = .25). The mean (SD) Respiratory Distress Assessment Instrument score improvement was greater in the HS group (–3.1 [3.2]) than in the NS group (–2.4 [3.3]) (adjusted difference, –0.7; 95% CI, –1.2 to –0.2; P = .006) and similarly for the Respiratory Assessment Change Score. Mild adverse events, such as worsening of cough, occurred more frequently among children in the HS group (35 of 392 [8.9%]) than among those in the NS group (15 of 384 [3.9%]) (risk difference, 5.0%; 95% CI, 1.6%-8.4%; P = .005), with no serious adverse events. Conclusions and Relevance Nebulized HS treatment did not significantly reduce the rate of hospital admissions among infants with a first episode of acute moderate to severe bronchiolitis who were admitted to the pediatric ED relative to NS, but mild adverse events were more frequent in the HS group. Trial Registration clinicaltrials.gov Identifier:NCT01777347

Details

ISSN :
21686203
Volume :
171
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
JAMA Pediatrics
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....9501e916bd0dec4d38b69e0308173ee0
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2017.1333