Back to Search
Start Over
Adjuvant Erlotinib Versus Placebo in Patients With Stage IB-IIIA Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer (RADIANT): A Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase III Trial
- Source :
- Kelly, K; Altorki, NK; Eberhardt, WEE; OBrien, MER; Spigel, DR; Crinò, L; et al.(2015). Adjuvant erlotinib versus placebo in patients with stage IB-IIIA nonsmall-cell lung cancer (RADIANT): A randomized, double-blind, Phase III trial. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 33(34), 4007-4014. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.61.8918. UC Davis: Retrieved from: http://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/2nv2v0wk, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, vol 33, iss 34
- Publication Year :
- 2015
- Publisher :
- American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), 2015.
-
Abstract
- Purpose Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) –tyrosine kinase inhibitors have proven efficacy in advanced non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We hypothesized that erlotinib would be efficacious in the adjuvant setting. Patients and Methods An international randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was conducted in patients with completely resected IB to IIIA NSCLC whose tumors expressed EGFR protein by immunohistochemistry or EGFR amplification by fluorescence in situ hybridization. Patients were assigned 2:1 to erlotinib 150 mg once per day or placebo for 2 years. Stratification factors were stage, histology, previous adjuvant chemotherapy, smoking status, EGFR amplification status, and country. The primary end point was disease-free survival (DFS); key secondary end points were overall survival (OS) and DFS and OS in patients whose tumors had EGFR-activating mutations (EGFRm-positive). Results A total of 973 patients were randomly assigned (November 26, 2007, to July 7, 2010). There was no statistically significant difference in DFS (median, 50.5 months for erlotinib and 48.2 months for placebo; hazard ratio, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.74 to 1.10; P = .324). Among the 161 patients (16.5%) in the EGFRm-positive subgroup, DFS favored erlotinib (median, 46.4 v 28.5 months; hazard ratio, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.38 to 0.98; P = .039), but this was not statistically significant because of the hierarchical testing procedure. OS data are immature. Rash and diarrhea were common adverse events occurring in 528 (86.4%) and 319 (52.2%) patients treated with erlotinib, respectively, versus 110 (32.1%) and 54 (15.7%) patients receiving placebo. The most common grade 3 adverse events in patients treated with erlotinib were rash (22.3%) and diarrhea (6.2%). Conclusion Adjuvant erlotinib did not prolong DFS in patients with EGFR-expressing NSCLC or in the EGFRm-positive subgroup. Further evaluation of erlotinib is warranted in the EGFRm-positive subgroup.
- Subjects :
- Male
Oncology
Cancer Research
Lung Neoplasms
medicine.medical_treatment
Medizin
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung
80 and over
Epidermal growth factor receptor
Non-Small-Cell Lung
Erlotinib Hydrochloride
Adjuvant
Aged, 80 and over
biology
Middle Aged
Prognosis
Survival Rate
ErbB Receptors
Chemotherapy, Adjuvant
Perspective
Female
Erlotinib
Receptor
medicine.drug
Adult
medicine.medical_specialty
Oncology and Carcinogenesis
Clinical Sciences
Antineoplastic Agents
and over
Young Adult
Double-Blind Method
Internal medicine
medicine
Carcinoma
Humans
Chemotherapy
Oncology & Carcinogenesis
Lung cancer
neoplasms
Survival rate
Neoplasm Staging
Aged
Epidermal Growth Factor
business.industry
International Agencies
medicine.disease
respiratory tract diseases
Surgery
Follow-Up Studies
Mutation
Receptor, Epidermal Growth Factor
Clinical trial
biology.protein
business
Subjects
Details
- ISSN :
- 15277755 and 0732183X
- Volume :
- 33
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....95c7a6c338ac029da62aef145d22733b
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2015.61.8918