Back to Search Start Over

Adjuvant Erlotinib Versus Placebo in Patients With Stage IB-IIIA Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer (RADIANT): A Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase III Trial

Authors :
Jiuzhou Wang
Eun Kyung Cho
David R. Spigel
Philip C. Hoffman
Julie D. Horan
Lucio Crinò
Sergey Orlov
Frances A. Shepherd
Joo Hang Kim
Mary O'Brien
Karen Kelly
Margaret A. Foley
Nasser K. Altorki
Piotr Serwatowski
Wilfried Eberhardt
C.-M. Tsai
Source :
Kelly, K; Altorki, NK; Eberhardt, WEE; OBrien, MER; Spigel, DR; Crinò, L; et al.(2015). Adjuvant erlotinib versus placebo in patients with stage IB-IIIA nonsmall-cell lung cancer (RADIANT): A randomized, double-blind, Phase III trial. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 33(34), 4007-4014. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.61.8918. UC Davis: Retrieved from: http://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/2nv2v0wk, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, vol 33, iss 34
Publication Year :
2015
Publisher :
American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), 2015.

Abstract

Purpose Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) –tyrosine kinase inhibitors have proven efficacy in advanced non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We hypothesized that erlotinib would be efficacious in the adjuvant setting. Patients and Methods An international randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was conducted in patients with completely resected IB to IIIA NSCLC whose tumors expressed EGFR protein by immunohistochemistry or EGFR amplification by fluorescence in situ hybridization. Patients were assigned 2:1 to erlotinib 150 mg once per day or placebo for 2 years. Stratification factors were stage, histology, previous adjuvant chemotherapy, smoking status, EGFR amplification status, and country. The primary end point was disease-free survival (DFS); key secondary end points were overall survival (OS) and DFS and OS in patients whose tumors had EGFR-activating mutations (EGFRm-positive). Results A total of 973 patients were randomly assigned (November 26, 2007, to July 7, 2010). There was no statistically significant difference in DFS (median, 50.5 months for erlotinib and 48.2 months for placebo; hazard ratio, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.74 to 1.10; P = .324). Among the 161 patients (16.5%) in the EGFRm-positive subgroup, DFS favored erlotinib (median, 46.4 v 28.5 months; hazard ratio, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.38 to 0.98; P = .039), but this was not statistically significant because of the hierarchical testing procedure. OS data are immature. Rash and diarrhea were common adverse events occurring in 528 (86.4%) and 319 (52.2%) patients treated with erlotinib, respectively, versus 110 (32.1%) and 54 (15.7%) patients receiving placebo. The most common grade 3 adverse events in patients treated with erlotinib were rash (22.3%) and diarrhea (6.2%). Conclusion Adjuvant erlotinib did not prolong DFS in patients with EGFR-expressing NSCLC or in the EGFRm-positive subgroup. Further evaluation of erlotinib is warranted in the EGFRm-positive subgroup.

Details

ISSN :
15277755 and 0732183X
Volume :
33
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....95c7a6c338ac029da62aef145d22733b
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2015.61.8918