Back to Search Start Over

Impact Forecasting to Support Emergency Management of Natural Hazards

Authors :
Karen Strehlow
Daniela I. V. Domeisen
Andrey Babeyko
Ralf Weisse
Andreas Wurpts
Michael Kunz
Florian Pantillon
Kai Schröter
Joaquim G. Pinto
Frauke Feser
Eleonora Rivalta
Massimiliano Pittore
Inga Monika Koszalka
Bruno Merz
Heinz Jürgen Punge
Christian Kuhlicke
David N. Bresch
Heidi Kreibich
Stefano Parolai
Laboratoire d'aérologie (LAERO)
Université Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier (UT3)
Université de Toulouse (UT)-Université de Toulouse (UT)-Observatoire Midi-Pyrénées (OMP)
Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD)-Université Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier (UT3)
Université de Toulouse (UT)-Université de Toulouse (UT)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Centre National d'Études Spatiales [Toulouse] (CNES)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Météo-France -Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Centre National d'Études Spatiales [Toulouse] (CNES)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Météo-France -Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)
Institut für Meteorologie und Klimaforschung - Troposphärenforschung (IMK-TRO)
Karlsruher Institut für Technologie (KIT)
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Observatoire Midi-Pyrénées (OMP)
Météo France-Centre National d'Études Spatiales [Toulouse] (CNES)-Université Fédérale Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD)-Météo France-Centre National d'Études Spatiales [Toulouse] (CNES)-Université Fédérale Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD)-Université Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier (UT3)
Université Fédérale Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées
Merz, B
Kuhlicke, C
Kunz, M
Pittore, M
Babeyko, A
Bresch, Dn
Domeisen, Div
Feser, F
Koszalka, I
Kreibich, H
Pantillon, F
Parolai, S
Pinto, Jg
Punge, Hj
Rivalta, E
Schroter, K
Strehlow, K
Weisse, R
Wurpts, A
Merz, Bruno
Kuhlicke, Christian
Kunz, Michael
Pittore, Massimiliano
Babeyko, Andrey
Bresch, David N.
Domeisen, Daniela I. V.
Feser, Frauke
Koszalka, Inga
Kreibich, Heidi
Pantillon, Florian
Parolai, Stefano
Pinto, Joaquim G.
Punge, Heinz Jürgen
Rivalta, Eleonora
Schröter, Kai
Strehlow, Karen
Weisse, Ralf
Wurpts, Andreas
Source :
Reviews of Geophysics, Reviews of Geophysics, 2020, 58 (4), ⟨10.1029/2020RG000704⟩, Reviews of Geophysics, American Geophysical Union, 2020, 58 (4), ⟨10.1029/2020RG000704⟩, Reviews of Geophysics, 58 (4), Reviews of geophysics, 58 (4), e2020RG000704, Merz, B.; Kuhlicke, C.; Kunz, M.; Pittore, M.; Babeyko, A.; Bresch, D.; Domeisen, D.; Feser, F.; Koszalka, I.; Kreibich, H.; Pantillon, F.; Parolei, S.; Pinto, J.; Punge, H.; Rivalta, E.; Schröter, K.; Strehlow, K.; Weisse, R.; Wurpts, A.: Impact Forecasting to Support Emergency Management of Natural Hazards. In: Reviews of Geophysics. Vol. 58 (2020) 4, e2020RG000704. (DOI: /10.1029/2020RG000704)
Publication Year :
2020
Publisher :
HAL CCSD, 2020.

Abstract

Forecasting and early warning systems are important investments to protect lives, properties and livelihood. While early warning systems are frequently used to predict the magnitude, location and timing of potentially damaging events, these systems rarely provide impact estimates, such as the expected amount and distribution of physical damage, human consequences, disruption of services or financial loss. Complementing early warning systems with impact forecasts has a two‐fold advantage: it would provide decision makers with richer information to take informed decisions about emergency measures, and focus the attention of different disciplines on a common target. This would allow capitalizing on synergies between different disciplines and boosting the development of multi‐hazard early warning systems. This review discusses the state‐of‐the‐art in impact forecasting for a wide range of natural hazards. We outline the added value of impact‐based warnings compared to hazard forecasting for the emergency phase, indicate challenges and pitfalls, and synthesize the review results across hazard types most relevant for Europe. Plain language summary Forecasting and early warning systems are important investments to protect lives, properties and livelihood. While such systems are frequently used to predict the magnitude, location and timing of potentially damaging events, they rarely provide impact estimates, such as the expected physical damage, human consequences, disruption of services or financial loss. Extending hazard forecast systems to include impact estimates promises many benefits for the emergency phase, for instance, for organising evacuations. We review and compare the state‐of‐the‐art of impact forcasting across a wide range of natural hazards, and outline opportunities and key challenges for research and development of impact forecasting.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
87551209 and 19449208
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Reviews of Geophysics, Reviews of Geophysics, 2020, 58 (4), ⟨10.1029/2020RG000704⟩, Reviews of Geophysics, American Geophysical Union, 2020, 58 (4), ⟨10.1029/2020RG000704⟩, Reviews of Geophysics, 58 (4), Reviews of geophysics, 58 (4), e2020RG000704, Merz, B.; Kuhlicke, C.; Kunz, M.; Pittore, M.; Babeyko, A.; Bresch, D.; Domeisen, D.; Feser, F.; Koszalka, I.; Kreibich, H.; Pantillon, F.; Parolei, S.; Pinto, J.; Punge, H.; Rivalta, E.; Schröter, K.; Strehlow, K.; Weisse, R.; Wurpts, A.: Impact Forecasting to Support Emergency Management of Natural Hazards. In: Reviews of Geophysics. Vol. 58 (2020) 4, e2020RG000704. (DOI: /10.1029/2020RG000704)
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....95cd7fb4c8031f5b7f86cf40f7c69b05
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1029/2020RG000704⟩