Back to Search Start Over

Impact of personal genomic risk information on melanoma prevention behaviors and psychological outcomes: a randomized controlled trial

Authors :
Michael G. Kimlin
Lyndal Trevena
Suzanne Dobbinson
David Espinoza
Martin W. Allen
Amelia K Smit
Georgina Fenton
Kate Dunlop
Gillian Reyes-Marcelino
Cynthia Low
Louise Keogh
Serigne Lo
Graham J. Mann
Anne E. Cust
Brooke V. Beswick
Rachael L. Morton
Peter A. Kanetsky
Jacqueline Savard
Phyllis Butow
Ainsley J Newson
Sarah Wordsworth
Judy Kirk
Matthew Law
Hugh Dawkins
Source :
Genetics in Medicine
Publication Year :
2021
Publisher :
Nature Publishing Group US, 2021.

Abstract

Purpose We evaluated the impact of personal melanoma genomic risk information on sun-related behaviors and psychological outcomes. Methods In this parallel group, open, randomized controlled trial, 1,025 Australians of European ancestry without melanoma and aged 18–69 years were recruited via the Medicare database (3% consent). Participants were randomized to the intervention (n = 513; saliva sample for genetic testing, personalized melanoma risk booklet based on a 40-variant polygenic risk score, telephone-based genetic counseling, educational booklet) or control (n = 512; educational booklet). Wrist-worn ultraviolet (UV) radiation dosimeters (10-day wear) and questionnaires were administered at baseline, 1 month postintervention, and 12 months postbaseline. Results At 12 months, 948 (92%) participants completed dosimetry and 973 (95%) the questionnaire. For the primary outcome, there was no effect of the genomic risk intervention on objectively measured UV exposure at 12 months, irrespective of traditional risk factors. For secondary outcomes at 12 months, the intervention reduced sunburns (risk ratio: 0.72, 95% confidence interval: 0.54–0.96), and increased skin examinations among women. Melanoma-related worry was reduced. There was no overall impact on general psychological distress. Conclusion Personalized genomic risk information did not influence sun exposure patterns but did improve some skin cancer prevention and early detection behaviors, suggesting it may be useful for precision prevention. There was no evidence of psychological harm.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
15300366 and 10983600
Volume :
23
Issue :
12
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Genetics in Medicine
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....9614d3759216420ede88b12818dfd0b1