Back to Search
Start Over
Cross-site analysis of perceived ecosystem service benefits in multifunctional landscapes
- Source :
- Fagerholm, N, Torralba, M, Moreno, G, Girardello, M, Herzog, F, Aviron, S, Burgess, P, Crous-Duran, J, Ferreiro-Dominguez, N, Graves, A, Hartel, T, Macicasan, V, Kay, S, Pantera, A, Varga, A & Plieninger, T 2019, ' Cross-site analysis of perceived ecosystem service benefits in multifunctional landscapes ', Global Environmental Change, vol. 56, pp. 134-147 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.04.002, Global Environmental Change, Global Environmental Change, Elsevier, 2019, 56, pp.134-147. ⟨10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.04.002⟩, www.reader.elsevier.com, Global Environmental Change, 2019, 56, pp.134-147. ⟨10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.04.002⟩
- Publication Year :
- 2019
-
Abstract
- International audience; Rural development policies in many Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) member countries promote sustainable landscape management with the intention of providing multiple ecosystem services (ES). Yet, it remains unclear which ES benefits are perceived in different landscapes and by different people. We present an assessment of ES benefits perceived and mapped by residents (n = 2,301) across 13 multifunctional (deep rural to peri-urban) landscapes in Europe. We identify the most intensively perceived ES benefits, their spatial patterns, and the respondent and landscape characteristics that determine ES benefit perception. We find outdoor recreation, aesthetic values and social interactions are the key ES benefits at local scales. Settlement areas are ES benefit hotspots but many benefits are also related to forests, waters and mosaic landscapes. We find some ES benefits (e.g. culture and heritage values) are spatially clustered, while many others (e.g. aesthetic values) are dispersed. ES benefit perception is linked to people's relationship with and accessibility to a landscape. Our study discusses how a local perspective can contribute to the development of contextualized and socially acceptable policies for sustainable ES management. We also address conceptual confusion in ES framework and present argumentation regarding the links from services to benefits, and from benefits to different types of values.
- Subjects :
- Public participation GIS
media_common.quotation_subject
[SDV]Life Sciences [q-bio]
Geography, Planning and Development
0211 other engineering and technologies
02 engineering and technology
010501 environmental sciences
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
Landscape characteristics
01 natural sciences
Argumentation theory
Ecosystem services
[SHS]Humanities and Social Sciences
Landscape management
Cultural ecosystem services
Perception
11. Sustainability
Landscape values
Environmental planning
Recreation
0105 earth and related environmental sciences
media_common
Global and Planetary Change
Ecology
021107 urban & regional planning
15. Life on land
Social relation
Europe
Geography
PPGIS
13. Climate action
Respondent
[SDE]Environmental Sciences
Rural area
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 09593780
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- Fagerholm, N, Torralba, M, Moreno, G, Girardello, M, Herzog, F, Aviron, S, Burgess, P, Crous-Duran, J, Ferreiro-Dominguez, N, Graves, A, Hartel, T, Macicasan, V, Kay, S, Pantera, A, Varga, A & Plieninger, T 2019, ' Cross-site analysis of perceived ecosystem service benefits in multifunctional landscapes ', Global Environmental Change, vol. 56, pp. 134-147 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.04.002, Global Environmental Change, Global Environmental Change, Elsevier, 2019, 56, pp.134-147. ⟨10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.04.002⟩, www.reader.elsevier.com, Global Environmental Change, 2019, 56, pp.134-147. ⟨10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.04.002⟩
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....96e58052a6e2596baae387f4d08ec506
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.04.002