Back to Search Start Over

2020 list of human papillomavirus assays suitable for primary cervical cancer screening

Authors :
Karen Canfell
Maribel Almonte
E. Peeters
Chris J.L.M. Meijer
Jesper Bonde
Kate Cuschieri
Peter Hillemanns
Marc Arbyn
Nicolas Wentzensen
Joakim Dillner
Marie Simon
Anja Ostrbenk Vanlencak
Remila Rezhake
Fang-Hui Zhao
Johannes Berkhof
Mario Poljak
Silvia de Sanjosé
Lan Xu
Murat Gultekin
Source :
Arbyn, M, Simon, M, Peeters, E, Xu, L, Meijer, C J L M, Berkhof, J, Cuschieri, K, Bonde, J, Ostrbenk Vanlencak, A, Zhao, F-H, Rezhake, R, Gultekin, M, Dillner, J, de Sanjosé, S, Canfell, K, Hillemanns, P, Almonte, M, Wentzensen, N & Poljak, M 2021, ' 2020 list of human papillomavirus assays suitable for primary cervical cancer screening ', Clinical Microbiology and Infection, vol. 27, no. 8, pp. 1083-1095 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2021.04.031, CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTION, Clinical Microbiology and Infection
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

Background Only clinically validated HPV assays can be accepted in cervical cancer screening. Objectives To update the list of high-risk HPV assays that fulfil the 2009 international validation criteria (Meijer-2009). Data Sources PubMed/Medline, Embase, Scopus, references from selected studies; published in January 2014-August 2020. Study eligibility criteria HPV test validation studies and primary screening studies, involving testing with an index HPV test and a comparator HPV test with reporting of disease outcome (occurrence of histologically confirmed cervical precancer [CIN2+]). Methods Overview tables of relative sensitivity and specificity, including non-inferiority statistics and test reproducibility; random-effect meta-analyses of the relative sensitivity and specificity for CIN2+ on index-vs comparator HPV tests. Participants Women participating in cervical cancer screening. Interventions Testing with an index and a comparator HPV test of clinician-collected cervical specimens and assessment of disease outcome ( Methods Assessment of relative clinical accuracy (including non-inferiority statistics index vs comparator assay) and test reproducibility; random effects meta-analyses of the relative sensitivity and specificity of index vs comparator tests. Results Seven hrHPV DNA tests consistently fulfilled all validation criteria in multiple studies using predefined test positivity cut-offs (Abbott RealTime High Risk HPV, Anyplex II HPV HR Detection, BD Onclarity HPV Assay, Cobas 4800 HPV Test, HPV-Risk Assay, PapilloCheck HPV-Screening Test and Xpert HPV). Another assay (Alinity m HR HPV Assay) was fully validated in one validation study. The newer Cobas 6800 HPV Test, was validated in two studies against Cobas 4800. Other tests partially fulfilled the international validation criteria (Cervista HPV HR Test, EUROArray HPV, Hybribio’s 14 High-Risk HPV, LMNX Genotyping Kit GP HPV, MALDI-TOF, RIATOL qPCR and a number of other in-house developed assays) since the non-inferior accuracy was reached after a posteriori cut-off optimisation, inconsistent accuracy findings in different studies, and/or insufficient reproducibility assessment. The APTIMA HPV Assay targeting E6/E7 mRNA of hrHPV was fully validated in one formal validation study and showed slightly lower pooled sensitivity but higher specificity than the standard comparator tests in seven screening studies. However, the current international validation criteria relate to DNA assays. The additional requirement for longitudinal performance data required for non-DNA based HPV assays was not assessed in this review. Conclusions Eleven hrHPV DNA assays fulfil all requirements for use in cervical cancer screening using clinician-collected specimens.

Details

ISSN :
14690691 and 1198743X
Volume :
27
Issue :
8
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....973f4d9c56b51a35bfdf19778525de10
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2021.04.031