Back to Search Start Over

Open versus Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass: A Comparative Study of Over 25,000 Open Cases and the Major Laparoscopic Bariatric Reported Series

Authors :
L. Michael Howell
Steven Hendrick
Joseph D. Afram
Mark T. Jaroch
Kenneth B Jones
Latham Flanagan
Oscar C. Lirio
James A Sapala
Michael P Schuhknecht
Peter N. Benotti
Michael H. Wood
William A. Sweet
Kerry Kole
Robert P Shapiro
C. Gary Cooper
Rafael F. Capella
Source :
Obesity Surgery. 16:721-727
Publication Year :
2006
Publisher :
Springer Science and Business Media LLC, 2006.

Abstract

Background: Laparoscopic bariatric surgery has experienced a rapid expansion of interest over the past 5 years, with a 470% increase. This rapid expansion has markedly increased overall cost, reducing surgical access. Many surgeons believe that the traditional open approach is a cheaper, safer, equally effective alternative. Methods: 16 highly experienced "open" bariatric surgeons with a combined total of 25,759 cases representing >200 surgeon years of experience, pooled their open Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (ORYGBP) data, and compared their results to the leading laparoscopic (LRYGBP) papers in the literature. Results: In the overall series, the incisional hernia rate was 6.4% using the standard midline incision. Utilizing the left subcostal incision (LSI), it was only 0.3%. Return to surgery in

Details

ISSN :
17080428 and 09608923
Volume :
16
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Obesity Surgery
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....9799b8ddb6099d202cb93202601bcf9d
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1381/096089206777346628