Back to Search Start Over

Thermostable HIV-1 group O reverse transcriptase variants with the same fidelity as murine leukaemia virus reverse transcriptase

Authors :
Mar Álvarez
Luis Menéndez-Arias
Verónica Barrioluengo
Daniela Barbieri
Centro de Biología Molecular Severo Ochoa [Madrid] (CBMSO)
Universidad Autonoma de Madrid (UAM)-Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas [Madrid] (CSIC)
V. Barrioluengo
M. Alvarez
D. Barbieri
L. Menéndez-Arias
Source :
Biochemical Journal, Biochemical Journal, Portland Press, 2011, 436 (3), pp.599-607. ⟨10.1042/BJ20101852⟩
Publication Year :
2011
Publisher :
HAL CCSD, 2011.

Abstract

Wild-type HIV-1 group O RT (reverse transcriptase) shows increased thermostability in comparison with HIV-1 group M subtype B RT and MLV (murine leukaemia virus) RT. However, its utility in the amplification of RNA targets is limited by the reduced accuracy of lentiviral RTs compared with oncoretroviral RTs (i.e. MLV RT). The effects of the mutations K65R, R78A and K65R/V75I on the fidelity of HIV-1 group O RTs were studied using gel-based and M13mp2 lacZ forward-mutation fidelity assays. Forward-mutation assays demonstrated that mutant RTs K65R, R78A and K65R/V75I showed >9-fold increased accuracy in comparison with the wild-type enzyme and were approximately two times more faithful than the MLV RT. Compared with MLV RT, all of the tested HIV-1 group O RT variants showed decreased frameshift fidelity. However, K65R RT showed a higher tendency to introduce one-nucleotide deletions in comparison with other HIV-1 group O RT variants. R78A had a destabilizing effect on the RT, either in the presence or absence of V75I. At temperatures above 52 °C, K65R and K65R/V75I retained similar levels of DNA polymerase activity to the wild-type HIV-1 group O RT, but were more efficient than HIV-1 group M subtype B and MLV RTs. K65R, K65R/V75I and R78A RTs showed decreased misinsertion and mispair extension fidelity in comparison with the wild-type enzyme for most base pairs studied. These assays revealed that nucleotide selection is mainly governed by kpol (pol is polymerization) in the case of K65R, whereas both kpol and Kd affect nucleotide discrimination in the case of K65R/V75I.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
02646021 and 14708728
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Biochemical Journal, Biochemical Journal, Portland Press, 2011, 436 (3), pp.599-607. ⟨10.1042/BJ20101852⟩
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....9832fc0a7818d467f57ad8518b3f0fd3
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1042/BJ20101852⟩