Back to Search
Start Over
Geographical Differences in Cardiovascular Comorbidities and Outcomes of COVID-19 Hospitalized Patients in the USA
- Source :
- Cardiology
- Publication Year :
- 2021
- Publisher :
- S. Karger AG, 2021.
-
Abstract
- Introduction: Cardiovascular comorbidities may predispose to adverse outcomes in hospitalized patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). However, across the USA, the burden of cardiovascular comorbidities varies significantly. Whether clinical outcomes of hospitalized patients with COVID-19 differ between regions has not yet been studied systematically. Here, we report differences in underlying cardiovascular comorbidities and clinical outcomes of patients hospitalized with COVID-19 in Texas and in New York state. Methods: We established a multicenter retrospective registry including patients hospitalized with COVID-19 between March 15 and July 12, 2020. Demographic and clinical data were manually retrieved from electronic medical records. We focused on the following outcomes: mortality, need for pharmacologic circulatory support, need for mechanical ventilation, and need for hemodialysis. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed. Results: Patients in the Texas cohort (n = 296) were younger (57 vs. 63 years, p value 2 vs. 28.5 kg/m2, p = 0.015), and they had higher rates of diabetes mellitus (41 vs. 30%; p = 0.014). In contrast, patients in the New York state cohort (n = 218) had higher rates of coronary artery disease (19 vs. 10%, p = 0.005) and atrial fibrillation (11 vs. 5%, p = 0.012). Pharmacologic circulatory support, mechanical ventilation, and hemodialysis were more frequent in the Texas cohort (21 vs. 13%, p = 0.020; 30 vs. 12%, p < 0.001; and 11 vs. 5%, p = 0.009, respectively). In-hospital mortality was similar between the 2 cohorts (16 vs. 18%, p = 0.469). After adjusting for differences in underlying comorbidities, only the use of mechanical ventilation remained significantly higher in the participating Texas hospitals (odds ratios [95% CI]: 3.88 [1.23, 12.24]). Median time to pharmacologic circulatory support was 8 days (interquartile range: 2, 13.8) in the Texas cohort compared to 1 day (0, 3) in the New York state cohort, while median time to in-hospital mortality was 16 days (10, 25.5) and 7 days (4, 14), respectively (both p < 0.001). In-hospital mortality was higher in the late versus the early study phase in the New York state cohort (24 vs. 14%, p = 0.050), while it was similar between the 2 phases in the Texas cohort (16 vs. 15%, p = 0.741). Conclusions: Geographical differences, including practice pattern variations and the impact of disease burden on provision of health care, are important for the evaluation of COVID-19 outcomes. Unadjusted data may cause bias affecting future regulatory policies and proper allocation of resources.
- Subjects :
- Adult
Cardiovascular Prevention: Research Article
medicine.medical_specialty
medicine.medical_treatment
New York
Comorbidity
Coronary artery disease
Cardiovascular comorbidities
Interquartile range
Clinical outcomes
Internal medicine
medicine
Humans
Pharmacology (medical)
Hospital Mortality
Mortality
Disease burden
Aged
Retrospective Studies
Aged, 80 and over
Mechanical ventilation
Coronavirus disease 2019
business.industry
Medical record
COVID-19
Odds ratio
Middle Aged
medicine.disease
Texas
Hospitalization
Cardiovascular Diseases
Cohort
Female
Hemodialysis
Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
business
Subjects
Details
- ISSN :
- 14219751 and 00086312
- Volume :
- 146
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- Cardiology
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....98d3b90572e91a6dfb1b6e3947914c88