Back to Search
Start Over
Quality of life in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer given maintenance treatment with pemetrexed versus placebo (H3E-MC-JMEN): results from a randomised, double-blind, phase 3 study
- Source :
- The Lancet Oncology. 13:292-299
- Publication Year :
- 2012
- Publisher :
- Elsevier BV, 2012.
-
Abstract
- Summary Background Pemetrexed maintenance therapy significantly improved overall survival and progression-free survival compared with placebo, and had a good safety profile in a phase 3 placebo-controlled study in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Results for quality of life, symptom palliation, and tolerability are presented here. Methods After four cycles of platinum-based induction therapy, 663 patients with stage IIIB or stage IV NSCLC and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1 were randomly assigned (in a 2:1 ratio) from March 15, 2005, to July 20, 2007, using the Pocock and Simon minimisation method to receive pemetrexed (500 mg/m 2 every 21 days; n=441) or placebo (n=222) plus best supportive care until disease progression. The primary efficacy data have been reported previously. Patients completed the Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) at baseline, after each cycle, and post-discontinuation. Worsening of symptoms was defined as an increase of 15 mm or more from baseline on a 100 mm scale for each LCSS item. The primary outcome for these quality-of-life analyses was time to worsening of symptoms, analysed for all randomised patients. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00102804. Findings Baseline characteristics, including LCSS scores, were well balanced between groups. Baseline LCSS scores were low, indicating low symptom burden for patients without disease progression after completion of first-line treatment. Longer time to worsening was recorded for pain (hazard ratio [HR] 0·76, 95% CI 0·59–0·99; p=0·041) and haemoptysis (HR 0·58, 95% CI 0·34–0·97; p=0·038) with pemetrexed than with placebo; no other significant differences in analyses of time to worsening were noted. Additional longitudinal analyses showed a greater increase in loss of appetite in the pemetrexed group than in the placebo group (4·3 mm vs 0·2 mm; p=0·028). Rates of resource use were statistically higher for pemetrexed than for placebo: admissions to hospital for drug-related adverse events (19 [4%] vs none; p=0·001), transfusions (42 [10%] vs seven [3%]; p=0·003), and erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (26 [6%] vs four [2%]; p=0·017). Interpretation Quality of life during maintenance therapy with pemetrexed is similar to placebo, except for a small increase in loss of appetite, and significantly delayed worsening of pain and haemoptysis. In view of the improvements in overall and progression-free survival noted with pemetrexed maintenance therapy, such treatment is an option for patients with advanced non-squamous NSCLC who have not progressed after platinum-based induction therapy. Funding Eli Lilly.
- Subjects :
- Male
Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic
Hemoptysis
medicine.medical_specialty
Asia
Guanine
Lung Neoplasms
Time Factors
Appetite
Pain
Phases of clinical research
Kaplan-Meier Estimate
Pemetrexed
Placebo
Disease-Free Survival
Double-Blind Method
Glutamates
Maintenance therapy
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung
Internal medicine
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
Humans
Medicine
Adverse effect
Lung cancer
Aged
Proportional Hazards Models
Analysis of Variance
business.industry
Hazard ratio
Middle Aged
medicine.disease
United States
Surgery
Europe
Treatment Outcome
Oncology
Tolerability
Quality of Life
Female
business
Brazil
medicine.drug
Subjects
Details
- ISSN :
- 14702045
- Volume :
- 13
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- The Lancet Oncology
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....99862eee39bf3175d4cc7f66dbdc7b54
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s1470-2045(11)70339-4