Back to Search
Start Over
A comparison of nerve stimulator guided paravertebral block and ilio-inguinal nerve block for analgesia after inguinal herniorrhaphy in children
- Source :
- Anaesthesia. 61:1064-1068
- Publication Year :
- 2006
- Publisher :
- Wiley, 2006.
-
Abstract
- Summary The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of nerve stimulator guided paravertebral block with ilio-inguinal nerve block in children undergoing inguinal herniorrhaphy. Eighty children were randomly allocated to receive either paravertebral block or ilio-inguinal nerve block. Each block was evaluated in terms of intra-operative haemodynamic stability, postoperative pain scores at rest, on movement and during activity, requirement for supplemental analgesia and parental satisfaction. Haemodynamic stability was maintained significantly better during sac traction in the paravertebral block group (p < 0.005). Pain scores and analgesic consumption were significantly lower in the paravertebral block group during the postoperative follow-up period (p < 0.05). Parental satisfaction (93% vs 69%) and surgeon satisfaction (93% vs 64%) were significantly higher in the paravertebral block group (p < 0.05). Paravertebral blockade improved and prolonged postoperative analgesia, and was associated with greater parental and surgeon satisfaction when compared to ilio-inguinal nerve block.
- Subjects :
- Male
medicine.medical_specialty
medicine.medical_treatment
Analgesic
Hemodynamics
Blood Pressure
Hernia, Inguinal
Heart Rate
Block (telecommunications)
medicine
Humans
Paravertebral Block
Prospective Studies
Child
Pain Measurement
Postoperative Care
Analgesics
Pain, Postoperative
business.industry
Nerve Block
Electric Stimulation
Surgery
Blockade
Spinal Nerves
Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
Patient Satisfaction
Child, Preschool
Anesthesia
Inguinal herniorrhaphy
Nerve block
Female
business
Nerve stimulator
Subjects
Details
- ISSN :
- 13652044 and 00032409
- Volume :
- 61
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- Anaesthesia
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....9a1771de9680d5185d6d7f4e89fb314f
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2044.2006.04833.x