Back to Search Start Over

Anti-bat ultrasound production in moths is globally and phylogenetically widespread

Authors :
Jesse R. Barber
David Plotkin
Juliette J. Rubin
Nicholas T. Homziak
Brian C. Leavell
Peter R. Houlihan
Krystie A. Miner
Jesse W. Breinholt
Brandt Quirk-Royal
Pablo Sebastián Padrón
Matias Nunez
Akito Y. Kawahara
Source :
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 119
Publication Year :
2022
Publisher :
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2022.

Abstract

Warning signals are well known in the visual system, but rare in other modalities. Some moths produce ultrasonic sounds to warn bats of noxious taste or to mimic unpalatable models. Here, we report results from a long-term study across the globe, assaying moth response to playback of bat echolocation. We tested 252 genera, spanning most families of large-bodied moths, and document anti-bat ultrasound production in 52 genera, with eight subfamily origins described. Based on acoustic analysis of ultrasonic emissions and palatability experiments with bats, it seems that acoustic warning and mimicry are the raison d'être for sound production in most moths. However, some moths use high-duty-cycle ultrasound capable of jamming bat sonar. In fact, we find preliminary evidence of independent origins of sonar jamming in at least six subfamilies. Palatability data indicate that jamming and warning are not mutually exclusive strategies. To explore the possible organization of anti-bat warning sounds into acoustic mimicry rings, we intensively studied a community of moths in Ecuador and, using machine-learning approaches, found five distinct acoustic clusters. While these data represent an early understanding of acoustic aposematism and mimicry across this megadiverse insect order, it is likely that ultrasonically signaling moths comprise one of the largest mimicry complexes on earth.

Details

ISSN :
10916490 and 00278424
Volume :
119
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....9a48d969f33e256de0430fcc992ef758
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2117485119