Impact of a Monoplane Hemodynamic TEE (hTEE) Monitoring Device on Decision Making in a Heterogeneous Hemodynamically Unstable Intensive Care Unit Population: A Prospective, Observational Study

Objective This prospective observational study was undertaken to evaluate the utility of a miniature transesophageal echocardiography probe (ImaCor hemodynamic [hTEE]) in the management of hemodynamically unstable intensive care unit patients with and without various forms of mechanical circulatory support. Design A prospective observational study. Setting A single tertiary care cardiothoracic and surgical intensive care unit. Participants Fifty-three cardiothoracic and surgical intensive care unit patients undergoing miniature transesophageal echocardiography examinations. All patients had hemodynamic instability as defined by necessity of mechanical circulatory support (MCS) devices or vasoactive medications. Interventions From April 2012 to February 2014, 53 hemodynamically unstable intensive care unit patients received an examination with the miniature transesophageal echocardiography probe when deemed necessary by the intensivist for rapid and/or ongoing transesophageal echocardiographic examinations. Twenty-eight of the examinations were performed in patients with MCS devices (53%). The remainder of examinations (n = 25, 47%) were performed in patients after other cardiothoracic surgery or noncardiac surgery with cardiac complications. Measurements and Main Results The measured endpoint was determination of usefulness of management guidance due to the miniature transesophageal echocardiographic examination as assessed by the intensivist caring for the patient. The incidence of hTEE imaging provoking a change in management also was recorded. Overall, of the 53 examinations, 77% (n = 41) provided useful information to the management. Of the 25 examinations in patients without MCS, 92% (n = 23) of the examinations were useful in guiding management. Among the 28 examinations in patients with MCS devices, 64% (n = 18) of examinations were useful in guiding management (odds ratio = 0.156; 95% confidence interval, 0.015-0.899; p = 0.022). Eight of the 53 examinations (15%) were deemed to have “poor image quality” by the echocardiographer. Age, sex, and body mass index did not significantly affect the usefulness of the hTEE examinations. Conclusion Examination of a heterogeneous hemodynamically unstable intensive care population with a miniature transesophageal echocardiography probe provided useful information beyond standard intensive care unit monitoring data, which influenced post-hTEE medical decision making. The examinations were more useful in patients without MCS devices than in those with MCS. Of the patients with MCS, patients with durable ventricular assist devices had the lowest rate of useful examinations.