Back to Search Start Over

Spinal versus general anesthesia in cesarean sections: the effects on postoperative pain perception

Authors :
Adi Leizerovich
Arnon Wiznitzer
Barak Aricha-Tamir
Eyal Sheiner
Alexander Zlotnik
Gali Pariente
Hana Polachek
Adi Y. Weintraub
Fernanda Press
Roy Kessous
Source :
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics. 286:75-79
Publication Year :
2012
Publisher :
Springer Science and Business Media LLC, 2012.

Abstract

To compare postoperative pain perception and analgesia requirements in patients undergoing cesarean section (CS) using general versus spinal anesthesia. A prospective, observational study of patients undergoing elective CS during 2009 under either general or spinal anesthesia. Postoperative pain intensity and analgesia requirements were evaluated for up to 48 h after surgery. A total of 153 women were enrolled; 77 received general and 76 received regional anesthesia. Postoperative meperidine requirements in the first 24 h were significantly higher in the general anesthesia group. Pain scores were mostly comparable between the groups. Nevertheless, lower pain scores were graded after 8 h in the general versus the spinal anesthesia and this reversed at 48 h. Spinal anesthesia is comparable to general anesthesia in terms of post-operative pain control. In choosing the type of anesthesia in CS, other factors such as the urgency and potential maternal and fetal hazards should be taken into account.

Details

ISSN :
14320711 and 09320067
Volume :
286
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....9b4b5f18ae76abff3f80215e3e94aa5c
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-012-2265-y