Back to Search
Start Over
Spinal versus general anesthesia in cesarean sections: the effects on postoperative pain perception
- Source :
- Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics. 286:75-79
- Publication Year :
- 2012
- Publisher :
- Springer Science and Business Media LLC, 2012.
-
Abstract
- To compare postoperative pain perception and analgesia requirements in patients undergoing cesarean section (CS) using general versus spinal anesthesia. A prospective, observational study of patients undergoing elective CS during 2009 under either general or spinal anesthesia. Postoperative pain intensity and analgesia requirements were evaluated for up to 48 h after surgery. A total of 153 women were enrolled; 77 received general and 76 received regional anesthesia. Postoperative meperidine requirements in the first 24 h were significantly higher in the general anesthesia group. Pain scores were mostly comparable between the groups. Nevertheless, lower pain scores were graded after 8 h in the general versus the spinal anesthesia and this reversed at 48 h. Spinal anesthesia is comparable to general anesthesia in terms of post-operative pain control. In choosing the type of anesthesia in CS, other factors such as the urgency and potential maternal and fetal hazards should be taken into account.
- Subjects :
- Adult
medicine.medical_specialty
Time Factors
Meperidine
Postoperative pain
Anesthesia, General
Anesthesia, Spinal
Young Adult
Pain control
Pregnancy
medicine
Anesthesia, Obstetrical
Humans
Prospective Studies
Young adult
Prospective cohort study
Pain Measurement
Pain, Postoperative
Cesarean Section
business.industry
Obstetrics and Gynecology
Spinal anesthesia
Pain Perception
General Medicine
medicine.disease
Surgery
Analgesics, Opioid
Regional anesthesia
Anesthesia
Female
Observational study
business
Subjects
Details
- ISSN :
- 14320711 and 09320067
- Volume :
- 286
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....9b4b5f18ae76abff3f80215e3e94aa5c
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-012-2265-y