Back to Search Start Over

Factors affecting the outcome of delayed intravenous thrombolysis (> 4.5 hours)

Authors :
S. Vallone
Ahmed Saied
Stefano Meletti
L. Vandelli
Guido Bigliardi
G. Borzì
Nada Elsaid
R. Ricceri
Maria Luisa Dell'Acqua
Ludovico Ciolli
Roberta Pentore
Livio Picchetto
Source :
Revue Neurologique. 177:1266-1275
Publication Year :
2021
Publisher :
Elsevier BV, 2021.

Abstract

Introduction Evidence of the intravenous tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) efficacy beyond the 4.5 hours window is emerging. We aim to study the factors affecting the outcome of delayed thrombolysis in patients of clear onset acute ischemic stroke (AIS). Methods Data of patients with AIS who received intravenous thrombolytic after 4.5 hours were reviewed including: demographics, risk factors, clinical, laboratory, investigational and radiological data, evidence of mismatch, treatment type and onset, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score at baseline, 24 hours, 7 days after thrombolysis and before discharge, and 3 months follow-up modified Rankin Scale (mRS). Results We report 136 patients treated by intravenous tPA between 4.53 and 19.75 hours with average duration of 5.7 h. The ASPECT score of our patients was ≥ 7. Sixty-four cases showed intracranial arterial occlusion . Perfusion mismatch was detected in 117 (84.6%) patients, while clinical imaging mismatch was detected in 19 (15.4%). Early neurological improvement after 24 hours occurred in 114 (83.8%) patients. At 90 days, 91 patients (67%) achieved good outcome (mRS 0–2), while 45 (33%) had bad outcome (mRS 3–6). Age, endovascular treatment, NIHSS, AF , and HT were significantly higher in the bad outcome group. Age ( P = 0.001, OR: 1.099, 95% CI: 1.042–1.160) and baseline NIHSS were predictive of the poor outcome (P = 0.002, OR: 1.151, 95% CI: 1.055–1.256). The best cutoff value of age was 72.5 with AUC of 0.76, sensitivity 73.3% and specificity 60.4%. While for NIHSS at admission, the cutoff value of 7 showed the best results with AUC of 0.73, sensitivity 71.1% and specificity 63.7%. Combination of age and admission NIHSS raised the sensitivity and specificity to 84.4% and 63.7%, respectively. Conclusion Increased age and admission NIHSS may adversely affect the outcome of delayed thrombolysis and narrow the eligibility criteria. Age and baseline NIHSS based stratification of the patients may provide further evidence as regards the efficacy of the delayed thrombolysis.

Details

ISSN :
00353787
Volume :
177
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Revue Neurologique
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....9b509101917aeafee05a0096e0fd92cc
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurol.2021.04.010