Back to Search Start Over

Distraction and driving: results from a case-control responsibility study of traffic crash injured drivers interviewed at the emergency room

Authors :
Céline Lemercier
Magali Laborey
Sarah Bakiri
Benjamin Contrand
Catherine Gabaude
E. Lagarde
Régis Ribéreau-Gayon
Manuel-Pierre Bouvard
Alexandra Fort
Bertrand Maury
Ludivine Orriols
Cédric Galéra
Louis-Richard Salmi
Maurice Cours
Epidémiologie et Biostatistique [Bordeaux]
Université Bordeaux Segalen - Bordeaux 2-Institut de Santé Publique, d'Épidémiologie et de Développement (ISPED)-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)
Laboratoire Ergonomie et Sciences Cognitives pour les Transports (IFSTTAR/TS2/LESCOT)
Institut Français des Sciences et Technologies des Transports, de l'Aménagement et des Réseaux (IFSTTAR)-Université de Lyon
Laboratoire de Mathématiques d'Orsay (LM-Orsay)
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université Paris-Sud - Paris 11 (UP11)
Cognition, Langues, Langage, Ergonomie (CLLE-LTC)
École pratique des hautes études (EPHE)
Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-Université Toulouse - Jean Jaurès (UT2J)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)
Continental Automotive France [Toulouse]
Charles Perrens Hospital, Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry
Université de Bordeaux (UB)
Source :
Accident Analysis and Prevention, Accident Analysis and Prevention, Elsevier, 2013, 59, pp. 588-592. ⟨10.1016/j.aap.2013.06.004⟩
Publication Year :
2013
Publisher :
HAL CCSD, 2013.

Abstract

Background : Use of cellular phones have been shown to be associated with crashes but many external distractions remain to be studied. Objective : To assess the risk associated with diversion of attention due to unexpected events or secondary tasks at the wheel. Design : Responsibility case-control study. Setting : Adult emergency department of the Bordeaux University Hospital (France) from April 2010 to August 2011. Participants : 955 injured drivers presenting as a result of motor vehicle crash. Main outcome measures : The main outcome variable was responsibility for the crash. Exposures were external distraction, alcohol use, psychotropic medicine use, and sleep deprivation. Potential confounders were sociodemographic and crash characteristics. Results : Beyond classical risk factor found to be associated with responsibility, results showed that distracting events inside the vehicle (picking up an object), distraction due to driver activity (smoking) and distracting events occurring outside were associated with an increased probability of being at fault. These distraction-related factors accounted for 8% of injurious road crashes. Limitations : Retrospective responsibility self-assessment Conclusions : Diverted attention may carry more risk than expected. Our results are supporting recent research efforts to detect periods of driving vulnerability related to inattention.

Details

Language :
French
ISSN :
00014575
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Accident Analysis and Prevention, Accident Analysis and Prevention, Elsevier, 2013, 59, pp. 588-592. ⟨10.1016/j.aap.2013.06.004⟩
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....9b5e2c7109f72b1d6c42c06969492669
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2013.06.004⟩