Back to Search Start Over

Thulium laser transurethral vaporesection of the prostate versus transurethral resection of the prostate for men with lower urinary tract symptoms or urinary retention (UNBLOCS): a randomised controlled trial

Authors :
Sara T Brookes
Paul Abrams
Benita Adams
Nicholas Cohen
J. Athene Lane
Angela J. Allan
Lyndsey Johnson
Jo Worthington
Chris Metcalfe
Hilary Taylor
Jonathan Sullivan
Tobias Page
Aideen Ahern
Sian Noble
Joan Henderson
Paula Hilltout
Kim Davenport
Carol Brain
Christopher Blake
Leigh Morrison
Wendy Robson
Christopher Pawsey
Bernadette Kilbane
Rupert Beck
Oliver Kayes
Julie Plant
Rafiyah Khan
Anthony G. Timoney
Fiona Hammonds
Grace J. Young
Mai Baquedano
Aida Moure Fernandez
Tom Steuart-Feilding
Nikki Cotterill
Hashim Hashim
Alan D. Uren
K. Satchi Swami
Vivian Zinyemba
Mathialagan Murugesan
Lorraine Wiseman
David Carmichael
Barbara Warnes
Source :
Lancet (London, England)
Publication Year :
2019

Abstract

Summary Background Transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) is the standard operation for benign prostatic obstruction. Thulium laser transurethral vaporesection of the prostate (ThuVARP) is a technique with suggested advantages over TURP, including reduced complications and hospital stay. We aimed to investigate TURP versus ThuVARP in men with lower urinary tract symptoms or urinary retention secondary to benign prostatic obstruction. Methods In this randomised, blinded, parallel-group, pragmatic equivalence trial, men in seven UK hospitals with bothersome lower urinary tract symptoms or urinary retention secondary to benign prostatic obstruction were randomly assigned (1:1) at the point of surgery to receive ThuVARP or TURP. Patients were masked until follow-up completion. Centres used their usual TURP procedure (monopolar or bipolar). All trial surgeons underwent training on the ThuVARP technique. Co-primary outcomes were maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax) and International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) at 12-months post-surgery. Equivalence was defined as a difference of 2·5 points or less for IPSS and 4 mL per s or less for Qmax. Analysis was done according to the intention-to-treat principle. The trial is registered with the ISRCTN Registry, ISRCTN00788389. Findings Between July 23, 2014, and Dec 30, 2016, 410 men were randomly assigned to ThuVARP or TURP, 205 per study group. TURP was superior for Qmax (mean 23·2 mL per s for TURP and 20·2 mL per s for ThuVARP; adjusted difference in means −3·12, 95% CI −5·79 to −0·45). Equivalence was shown for IPSS (mean 6·3 for TURP and 6·4 for ThuVARP; adjusted difference in means 0·28, −0·92 to 1·49). Mean hospital stay was 48 h in both study groups. 91 (45%) of 204 patients in the TURP group and 96 (47%) of 203 patients in the ThuVARP group had at least one complication. Interpretation TURP and ThuVARP were equivalent for urinary symptom improvement (IPSS) 12-months post-surgery, and TURP was superior for Qmax. Anticipated laser benefits for ThuVARP of reduced hospital stay and complications were not observed. Funding UK National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment Programme.

Details

ISSN :
1474547X
Volume :
396
Issue :
10243
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Lancet (London, England)
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....9b73db0cded00063ec6fd9afd7d9c9bf