Back to Search Start Over

Quality Improvement Education for Health Professionals

Authors :
Atsushi Sorita
Tarig Elraiyah
Henry H. Ting
Mohammad Hassan Murad
Kristine M. Thompson
Pavithra R. Bora
Stephanie R. Starr
Barbara L. Porter
David L. Mapes
Daniel Kuo
Catherine C. Roberts
Jordan M. Kautz
Darcy A. Reed
Source :
American Journal of Medical Quality. 31:209-216
Publication Year :
2015
Publisher :
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health), 2015.

Abstract

Effective quality improvement (QI) education should improve patient care, but many curriculum studies do not include clinical measures. The research team evaluated the prevalence of QI curricula with clinical measures and their association with several curricular features. MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, and ERIC were searched through December 31, 2013. Study selection and data extraction were completed by pairs of reviewers. Of 99 included studies, 11% were randomized, and 53% evaluated clinically relevant measures; 85% were from the United States. The team found that 49% targeted 2 or more health professions, 80% required a QI project, and 65% included coaching. Studies involving interprofessional learners (odds ratio [OR] = 6.55; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.71-15.82), QI projects (OR = 13.60; 95% CI = 2.92-63.29), or coaching (OR = 4.38; 95% CI = 1.79-10.74) were more likely to report clinical measures. A little more than half of the published QI curricula studies included clinical measures; they were more likely to include interprofessional learners, QI projects, and coaching.

Details

ISSN :
1555824X and 10628606
Volume :
31
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
American Journal of Medical Quality
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....9b7818d30982c2db5bd236fff305ce53