Back to Search Start Over

The dose of inhaled corticosteroids in patients with COPD: when less is better

Authors :
José Luis Izquierdo
Borja G. Cosío
Source :
International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Publication Year :
2018
Publisher :
Informa UK Limited, 2018.

Abstract

Background: The use of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) in combination with bronchodilators in patients with COPD has been shown to decrease the rate of disease exacerbations and to improve the lung function and patients' quality of life. However, their use has also been associated with an increased risk of pneumonia. Materials and methods: We have reviewed existing clinical evidence on the risks and benefits of ICS in COPD, including large randomized clinical trials, meta-analyses, and clinical reviews. Results: A large body of evidence supports the clinical benefits of ICS in patients with COPD in terms of exacerbations, symptoms, lung function, and quality of life. The incidence of adverse events related to ICS, including pneumonia, varies strongly among the studies and seems to be dose dependent, with recent well-designed, large studies on low-dose ICS reporting similar safety profiles in ICS and non-ICS groups. Conclusion: The benefits of ICS in COPD continue to outweigh the risks, especially when lower ICS doses are employed. Given that the data on ICS withdrawal in COPD are scarce and conflicting, we argue that using reduced doses of ICS could be an optimal strategy to manage patients with COPD.<br />Jose Luis Izquierdo reports speaker fees, travel grants, and advisory board fees from AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Chiesi, Glaxo Smith Kline, Menarini, Novartis, Pfizer, Sandoz, and Teva. Borja G. Cosio reports speaker fees, travel grants, and advisory board fees from AstraZeneca, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Chiesi, Menarini, Mundipharma, Novartis, Sanofi, and Teva.

Details

ISSN :
11782005
Volume :
13
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....9c09d5d1269840b38b0f041b8f923360
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.2147/copd.s175047