Back to Search Start Over

Oncologist-Reported Barriers and Facilitators to Enrolling Patients in Optimization Trials That Test Less Intense Cancer Treatment

Authors :
Gabrielle B. Rocque
Courtney Andrews
Valerie M. Lawhon
Rachel Frazier
Stacey A. Ingram
Mary Lou Smith
Lynne I. Wagner
Lisa Zubkoff
Nadine Tung
Lauren P. Wallner
Antonio C. Wolff
Source :
JCO Oncology Practice. 19:e263-e273
Publication Year :
2023
Publisher :
American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), 2023.

Abstract

PURPOSE: As outcomes improve in early-stage breast cancer, clinical trials are undergoing a paradigm shift from intensification trials (more therapy) to improve survival to optimization trials, which assess the potential for using less toxic therapy while preserving survival outcomes. However, little is known about physician perspectives in community and academic settings about possible barriers and facilitators that could affect accrual to optimization clinical trials and the generalizability of future findings. METHODS: We conducted a qualitative study with semistructured interviews of medical oncologists from different academic and community practices to assess their perspectives on optimization trials. Interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed. Three independent coders used a content analysis approach to analyze transcripts using NVivo. Major themes and exemplary quotes were extracted. RESULTS: All 39 physicians reported that they would enroll patients in optimization clinical trials. Oncologists highlighted specific reasons to consider optimization trials. These included quality-of-life improvement by reducing toxicity, reduction in financial toxicity, fertility preservation, ability to avoid chemotherapy, minimization of overtreatment in patients with comorbid conditions, personalized treatment, opportunities to test novel therapies, and leveraging the availability of targeted therapies. Oncologists also identified accrual barriers, such as tumor-specific biology, individual (host) factors, prognostic markers of risk, access to therapies, provider experience, and system constraints. They voiced recommendations regarding preliminary data, trial design, and tools to support enrollment in optimization trials. CONCLUSION: Although oncologists are generally willing to enroll patients on optimization clinical trials, barriers affect their acceptance. A scientific focus on overcoming these barriers is needed to support future enrollment on trials tailoring therapy on the basis of risk and potential benefit to allow true personalization of treatment.

Details

ISSN :
26881535 and 26881527
Volume :
19
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
JCO Oncology Practice
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....9c7b4262a36aa63bc978e37e1509e4df
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1200/op.22.00472