Back to Search Start Over

Personalized response-driven adjuvant therapy after combination ipilimumab and nivolumab in high-risk resectable stage III melanoma: PRADO trial

Authors :
Alexander M. Menzies
Ellen Kapiteijn
Alexander C.J. van Akkooi
Lars Bastholt
Christian U. Blank
Elisa A. Rozeman
Willem M.C. Klop
Bart A. van de Wiel
Irene L.M. Reijers
Andrew J. Spillane
Karijn P M Suijkerbuijk
Geke A. P. Hospers
Hanna Eriksson
James Larkin
Georgina V. Long
Inge Marie Svane
Henrik Schmidt
Astrid A M van der Veldt
Richard A. Scolyer
Source :
Reijers, I, Rozeman, E A, Menzies, A M, De Wiel, B A V, Eriksson, H, Suijkerbuijk, K, Van Der Veldt, A A M, Kapiteijn, E, Hospers, G, Klop, W M C, Spillane, A, Scolyer, R A, Svane, I M, Bastholt, L, Schmidt, H, Larkin, J M G, Van Akkooi, A C J, Long, G V & Blank, C U 2019, ' Personalized response-driven adjuvant therapy after combination ipilimumab and nivolumab in high-risk resectable stage III melanoma: PRADO trial ', Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol. 37, no. 15 Suppl., TPS9605 . https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2019.37.15_suppl.TPS9605
Publication Year :
2019
Publisher :
American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), 2019.

Abstract

TPS9605 Background: Adjuvant (adj) immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) improves relapse free survival (RFS) in stage III melanoma patients (pts). However, preclinical and translational data suggest that neo-adjuvant (neoadj) treatment might be favorable due to broader immune activation. The phase 1b OpACIN study comparing neoadj to adj IPI plus NIVO demonstrated a high pathological response rate (pRR) of 78% complicated by 90% gr 3-4 immune-related adverse events (irAEs). The phase 2 OpACIN-neo trial tested safety and efficacy of three different schemes of neoadj IPI+NIVO and identified two cycles of IPI 1mg/kg + NIVO 3mg/kg as well tolerated (20% gr 3-4 irAEs), with a high pRR of 77%. In both trials, none of the pts with a pathologic response have relapsed after a median follow-up of 30 and 8.3 months. In stage IV melanoma, long-term benefit is observed in patients achieving CR with ICI, even after cessation of therapy. This raises the question of whether a therapeutic lymph node dissection (TLND) can be omitted when a deep pathologic response with neoadj IPI+NIVO is achieved. Methods: The aim of this international multi-center investigator-initiated phase 2 PRADO extension study is to confirm the pRR and toxicity of 2 cycles of neoadjuvant IPI 1mg/kg + NIVO 3mg/kg (the preferred OPACIN-neo regimen) and to test response-driven subsequent therapy i.e. omitting surgery and adjuvant ICI based on the pathological response. 100-110 pts with stage IIIB/C melanoma and a measurable lymph node (≥15mm according to RECIST 1.1) will receive two cycles of IPI 1mg/kg + NIVO 3mg/kg after marker placement into the largest lymph node metastasis. After six weeks, pts will undergo resection of the index lymph node. For pCR/near pCR, pts will not undergo TLND; For pPR, pts will undergo TLND; and for pNR, pts will undergo TLND and start adjuvant NIVO or targeted therapy +/- radiotherapy for 52 weeks. Primary endpoints are pRR of marked lymph node and RFS at 24 months. Baseline biopsies, blood samples (week 0, 6, 12) and faeces (week 0, 6) will be collected for translational research analyses. The first patient in this trial was included in October 2018; 22 patients have been enrolled. Clinical trial information: NCT02977052.

Details

ISSN :
15277755, 0732183X, and 02977052
Volume :
37
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....9c98b636b3dd00b5a364206cf1137b94
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2019.37.15_suppl.tps9605