Back to Search Start Over

Newly discovered coronavirus as the primary cause of severe acute respiratory syndrome

Authors :
Robin Gopal
Gerard J. J. van Doornum
Martin Schutten
J. S. Malik Peiris
Nicolas Escriou
Jean Claude Manuguerra
Guus F. Rimmelzwaan
Ton de Jong
Maria Zambon
Albert D. M. E. Osterhaus
Sylvie van der Werf
Ai Ee Ling
Wilina Lim
Geert van Amerongen
Debby van Riel
Ron A. M. Fouchier
Thijs Kuiken
John S. Tam
Klaus Stöhr
Jon D. Laman
Christian Drosten
Paul K.S. Chan
Department of Virology
Erasmus Medical Centre
Department of Immunology
Department of Pathology
Government Virus Unit
Public Health Laboratory Centre
Singapore General Hospital
department of microbiology
The Chinese University of Hong Kong [Hong Kong]-Prince of Wales Hospital
Enteric Respiratory and Neurological Virus laboratory
Health Protection Agency
Génétique Moléculaire des Virus Respiratoires
Institut Pasteur [Paris]-Université Paris Diderot - Paris 7 (UPD7)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)
SARS Aetiology Study Group
Organisation Mondiale de la Santé / World Health Organization Office (OMS / WHO)
Department of Microbiology and Medicine
The University of Hong Kong (HKU)-Queen mary Hospital
Institut Pasteur [Paris] (IP)-Université Paris Diderot - Paris 7 (UPD7)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)
Plazi
Virology
Immunology
Medical Informatics
Source :
The Lancet, The Lancet, Elsevier, 2003, 362 (9380), pp.263-70. ⟨10.1016/S0140-6736(03)13967-0⟩, The Lancet, 2003, 362 (9380), pp.263-70. ⟨10.1016/S0140-6736(03)13967-0⟩, Lancet (UK), 362, 263-270. Elsevier Ltd., Lancet (London, England)
Publication Year :
2003
Publisher :
HAL CCSD, 2003.

Abstract

Summary Background The worldwide outbreak of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) is associated with a newly discovered coronavirus, SARS-associated coronavirus (SARSCoV). We did clinical and experimental studies to assess the role of this virus in the cause of SARS. Methods We tested clinical and postmortem samples from 436 SARS patients in six countries for infection with SARSCoV, human metapneumovirus, and other respiratory pathogens. We infected four cynomolgus macaques (Macaca fascicularis) with SARS-CoV in an attempt to replicate SARS and did necropsies on day 6 after infection. Findings SARS-CoV infection was diagnosed in 329 (75%) of 436 patients fitting the case definition of SARS; human metapneumovirus was diagnosed in 41 (12%) of 335, and other respiratory pathogens were diagnosed only sporadically. SARS-CoV was, therefore, the most likely causal agent of SARS. The four SARS-CoV-infected macaques excreted SARS-CoV from nose, mouth, and pharynx from 2 days after infection. Three of four macaques developed diffuse alveolar damage, similar to that in SARS patients, and characterised by epithelial necrosis, serosanguineous exudate, formation of hyaline membranes, type 2 pneumocyte hyperplasia, and the presence of syncytia. SARS-CoV was detected in pneumonic areas by virus isolation and RT-PCR, and was localised to alveolar epithelial cells and syncytia by immunohistochemistry and transmission electron microscopy. Interpretation Replication in SARS-CoV-infected macaques of pneumonia similar to that in human beings with SARS, combined with the high prevalence of SARS-CoV infection in SARS patients, fulfill the criteria required to prove that SARS-CoV is the primary cause of SARS. Published online July 22, 2003 http://image.thelancet.com/extras/03art6318web.pdf

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
09237577, 01406736, and 1474547X
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
The Lancet, The Lancet, Elsevier, 2003, 362 (9380), pp.263-70. ⟨10.1016/S0140-6736(03)13967-0⟩, The Lancet, 2003, 362 (9380), pp.263-70. ⟨10.1016/S0140-6736(03)13967-0⟩, Lancet (UK), 362, 263-270. Elsevier Ltd., Lancet (London, England)
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....9ca4ffa59cd1cca5c01fe7d02ccdb2ad
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(03)13967-0⟩