Back to Search Start Over

Evaluation of nodal response after intra-arterial chemoradiation for node-positive head and neck cancer

Authors :
Akihiro Homma
Tomohiro Sakashita
Satoshi Kano
Takatsugu Mizumachi
Satoshi Fukuda
Nobuhiko Oridate
Hiromitsu Hatakeyama
Source :
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology. 269:1671-1676
Publication Year :
2011
Publisher :
Springer Science and Business Media LLC, 2011.

Abstract

This retrospective study aimed to compare the accuracy of two nodal evaluation criteria using computed tomography after intra-arterial chemoradiation in node-positive head and neck squamous cell carcinomas. Computed tomography was used to evaluate radiographic nodal response 4-8 weeks after intra-arterial chemoradiation. We compared the accuracy of two different criteria: criterion 1 (radiographic complete response was recorded in the absence of focal abnormalities and if the maximum diameter of the metastatic node was less than 15 mm), and criterion 2 (radiographic complete response was recorded in the absence of focal abnormalities and if the minimum diameter of metastatic nodes was less than 7 mm in level II and if the minimum diameter of metastatic nodes in the rest of the neck was less than 6 mm). Positive predictive values were criterion 1: 69.2%, criterion 2: 47.8%; negative predictive values were criterion 1: 88.5%, criterion 2: 90.5%. Positive likelihood ratios were criterion 1: 7.50, criterion 2: 3.06. The difference between each criteria was statistically significant using McNemar's test (p = 0.0016). Computed tomography evaluation accuracy of nodal response after intra-arterial chemoradiation was comparable to recent reports, and it was feasible to perform salvage neck dissection by computed tomography evaluation for nodal response. We recommend using criterion 1 because of its simplicity and reliability.

Details

ISSN :
14344726 and 09374477
Volume :
269
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....9caf85c99696810d3101dbcbc10fe67e
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-011-1814-5