Back to Search Start Over

Triple Oral Therapy Versus Antitumor Necrosis Factor Plus Methotrexate (MTX) in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis and Inadequate Response to MTX: A Systematic Literature Review

Authors :
Jacques Morel
Bernard Combe
Michel De Bandt
J. Mary
Cédric Lukas
Hôpital Pierre Zobda-Quitman [CHU de la Martinique]
CHU de la Martinique [Fort de France]
Département de Rhumatologie[Montpellier]
Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire [Montpellier] (CHRU Montpellier)-Hôpital Lapeyronie
Institut de Génétique Moléculaire de Montpellier (IGMM)
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université de Montpellier (UM)
CHU de la Martinique
Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire [Montpellier] ( CHRU Montpellier ) -Hôpital Lapeyronie
Institut de Génétique Moléculaire de Montpellier ( IGMM )
Université de Montpellier ( UM ) -Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique ( CNRS )
Source :
Journal of Rheumatology, Journal of Rheumatology, Journal of Rheumatology Publishing Company Limited, 2017, 44 (6), pp.773-779. ⟨10.3899/jrheum.160643⟩, Journal of Rheumatology, Journal of Rheumatology Publishing Company Limited, 2017, 44 (6), pp.773-779. 〈10.3899/jrheum.160643〉
Publication Year :
2017
Publisher :
The Journal of Rheumatology, 2017.

Abstract

Objective.For patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who have an inadequate response to methotrexate (MTX), the relative effectiveness of the combination of conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARD) compared with the combination of tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors and MTX, as second-line therapy, is uncertain. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and tolerance of triple oral DMARD therapy versus anti-TNF agents associated with MTX in patients with RA after MTX failure.Methods.We performed a systematic search of the literature up to November 2015 in MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane library, and abstracts from the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) and the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) meetings from 2006 to 2015. Articles were included if they were of randomized controlled trials of patients receiving triple oral combination therapy (TT; MTX + sulfasalazine + hydroxychloroquine) compared with anti-TNF agents plus MTX. Treatment effects were examined by disease activity [Disease Activity Score in 28 joints (DAS28)], ACR and EULAR response criteria, structural damage by the modified total Sharp score, and functional disability by the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ).Results.Our search identified 263 articles; only 5 fulfilled the selection criteria. Analysis of ACR and EULAR response criteria, DAS28, and modified Sharp scores favored anti-TNF agents combined with MTX. Functional disability (HAQ) and rates of adverse events did not differ between treatments.Conclusion.In patients with RA in whom MTX has failed, the addition of a TNF antagonist to MTX may be a valid option, with better clinical outcomes and better radiographic results in the presence of poor prognostic factors. In the absence of poor prognostic factors and/or with contraindications to biologic agents, TT retains its place in the therapeutic strategy for RA in a currently restricted economic context.

Details

ISSN :
14992752 and 0315162X
Volume :
44
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
The Journal of Rheumatology
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....9cb258824b0a6973eeb9cb67f3d61318