Back to Search
Start Over
Contemporary guidance for stated preference studies
- Source :
- Johnston, R J, Boyle, K J, Adamowicz, W, Bennett, J, Brouwer, R, Cameron, T A, Hanemann, W M, Hanley, N, Ryan, M, Scarpa, R, Tourangeau, R & Vossler, C A 2017, ' Contemporary guidance for stated preference studies ', Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 319-405 . https://doi.org/10.1086/691697, Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, 2017, Vol.4(2), pp.319-405 [Peer Reviewed Journal], Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, 4(2), 319-405. University of Chicago Press
- Publication Year :
- 2017
-
Abstract
- This article proposes contemporary best-practice recommendations forstated preference (SP) studies used to inform decision making, grounded in the accumulate body of peer-reviewed literature. These recommendations consider the use of SP methods to estimate both use and non-use (passive-use) values, and cover the broad SP domain, including contingent valuation and discrete choice experiments.We focus on applications to public goods in the context of the environmentand human health but also consider ways in which the proposed recommendations might apply to other common areas of application. The recommendations recognize that SP results may be used and reused (benefit transfers) by governmental agencies and nongovernmental organizations, and that all such applications must be considered.The intended result is a set of guidelines for SP studies that is more comprehensive than that of the original National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Blue Ribbon Panel on contingent valuation, is more germane to contemporary applications, and reflects the two decades of research since that time. We also distinguish between practices for which accumulated research is sufficient to support recommendations and those for which greater uncertainty remains. The goal of this article is to raise the quality of SP studies used to support decision making and promote research that will further enhance the practice of these studies worldwide.
- Subjects :
- Economics and Econometrics
SDG 16 - Peace
media_common.quotation_subject
Nonmarket valuation
Welfare
Context (language use)
Guidelines
010501 environmental sciences
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
01 natural sciences
Choice experiment
Choice experiment, Choice modelling, Contingent valuation, Guidelines, Nonmarket valuation, Questionnaire, Stated preference, Survey, Welfare
Choice modelling
0502 economics and business
Economics
Quality (business)
Contingent valuation
Marketing
Survey
Set (psychology)
0105 earth and related environmental sciences
Nature and Landscape Conservation
media_common
SDG 15 - Life on Land
Public economics
Questionnaire
05 social sciences
SDG 16 - Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Public good
Preference
Justice and Strong Institutions
Stated preference
050202 agricultural economics & policy
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 23335955
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- Johnston, R J, Boyle, K J, Adamowicz, W, Bennett, J, Brouwer, R, Cameron, T A, Hanemann, W M, Hanley, N, Ryan, M, Scarpa, R, Tourangeau, R & Vossler, C A 2017, ' Contemporary guidance for stated preference studies ', Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 319-405 . https://doi.org/10.1086/691697, Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, 2017, Vol.4(2), pp.319-405 [Peer Reviewed Journal], Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, 4(2), 319-405. University of Chicago Press
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....9cddf49256562f9a3245d51c78b9b97a