Back to Search Start Over

Amyloid-β PET and CSF in an autopsy confirmed cohort

Authors :
Annemieke J.M. Rozemuller
Charlotte E. Teunissen
Philip Scheltens
Baayla D.C. Boon
Rik Ossenkoppele
Juhan Reimand
Bart N.M. van Berckel
Lyduine E. Collij
Femke H. Bouwman
Publication Year :
2020
Publisher :
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, 2020.

Abstract

ObjectiveAccumulation of amyloid-β is among the earliest changes in Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Amyloid-β positron emission tomography (PET) and Aβ42 in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) both assess amyloid-β pathology in-vivo, but 10–20% of cases show discordant (CSF+/PET- or CSF-/PET+) results. The neuropathological correspondence with amyloid-β CSF/PET discordance is unknown.MethodsWe included 21 patients from our tertiary memory clinic who had undergone both CSF Aβ42 analysis and amyloid-β PET, and had neuropathological data available. Amyloid-β PET and CSF results were compared with neuropathological ABC scores (comprising of Thal (A), Braak (B) and CERAD (C) stage, all ranging from 0 [low] to 3 [high]) and neuropathological diagnosis.ResultsNeuropathological diagnosis was AD in 11 (52%) patients. Amyloid-β PET was positive in all A3, C2 and C3 cases and in one of the two A2 cases. CSF Aβ42 was positive in 92% of A2/A3 and 90% of C2/C3 cases. PET and CSF were discordant in 3/21 (14%) cases: CSF+/PET- in a patient with granulomatosis with polyangiitis (A0B0C0), CSF+/PET- in a patient with FTLD-TDP type B (A2B1C1), and CSF-/PET+ in a patient with AD (A3B3C3). Two CSF+/PET+ cases had a non-AD neuropathological diagnosis, i.e. FTLD-TDP type E (A3B1C1) and adult-onset leukoencephalopathy with axonal spheroids (A1B1C0).InterpretationOur findings confirm amyloid-β CSF/PET discordance with a range of possible reasons. Furthermore, amyloid-β biomarker positivity on both PET and CSF did not invariably result in an AD diagnosis at autopsy, illustrating the importance of considering relevant co-morbidities when evaluating amyloid-β biomarker results.

Details

Database :
OpenAIRE
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....9d34fb54039cac589f4c0259b4c7c014
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.06.02.20119891