Back to Search Start Over

Impacto do anestesiologista em treinamento sobre as pressões do manguito de máscara laríngea e incidência de eventos adversos

Authors :
Bülent Serhan Yurtlu
Bengü Köksal
Volkan Hanci
Hilal Ayoğlu
Işıl Özkoçak Turan
Dilek Okyay
Zonguldak Bülent Ecevit Üniversitesi
Source :
Revista Brasileira de Anestesiologia, Vol 65, Iss 6, Pp 455-460 (2015), Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology, Vol 65, Iss 6, Pp 455-460 (2015), Revista Brasileira de Anestesiologia, Volume: 65, Issue: 6, Pages: 455-460, Published: DEC 2015, Revista Brasileira de Anestesiologia v.65 n.6 2015, Revista Brasileira de Anestesiologia, Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia (SBA), instacron:SBA
Publication Year :
2015
Publisher :
Elsevier BV, 2015.

Abstract

WOS: 000367513200005<br />PubMed: 26614141<br />Objective: We have planned to evaluate the laryngeal mask cuff pressures (LMcp) inflated by anesthesia workers of several seniority, without using manometer. Methods: 180 patients scheduled to have short duration surgery with laryngeal mask were included in the study. Five anesthesia specialists (Group S), 10 residents (Group R) and 6 technicians (Group T) inflated the LMc; thereafter LMcp were measured with pressure manometer. Participants have repeated this practice in at least five different cases. LMcp higher than 60 cm H2O at the initial placement or intraoperative period were adjusted to normal range. Sore throat was questioned postoperatively. Groups were compared in terms of mean LMcp and occupational experience. Results: At the settlement of LM, LMcp pressures within the normal range were determined in 26 (14.4%) cases. Mean LMcp after LM placement in Group S, R and T were 101.2 +/- 14.0, 104.3+/-20.5 cm H2O and 105.2 18.4 cm H2O respectively (p >0.05). Mean LMcp values in all measurement time periods within the groups were above the normal limit (60 cm H2O). When groups were compared in terms of LMcp, no difference has been found among pressure values. Occupational experience was 14.2 3.9; 3.3 1.1 and 6.6 3.8 years for specialists, residents and technicians respectively and measured pressure values were not different in regard of occupational experience. Seven (3.9%) patients had sore throat at the 24th hour interview. Conclusion: Considering lower possibility of normal adjustment of LMcp and ineffectiveness of occupational experience to obtain normal pressure values, it is suitable that all anesthesia practitioners should adjust LMcp with manometer. (C) 2013 Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia. Published by Elsevier Editora Ltda. All rights reserved.

Details

ISSN :
01040014
Volume :
65
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology (English Edition)
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....9d731b40c6782ae9c5859fb3f1478ede
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjane.2013.03.005