Back to Search Start Over

Predictive risk factors for sentinel lymph node nonvisualization on planar lymphoscintigraphy using an intratumoral injection in patients with primary breast cancer

Authors :
Daan Hellingman
Marcel P. M. Stokkel
Paula H.M. Elkhuizen
Emiel J. Th. Rutgers
Oi Yan Wan
Berlinda J. de Wit-van der Veen
Iris M. C. van der Ploeg
Source :
Nuclear Medicine Communications. 40:317-324
Publication Year :
2019
Publisher :
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health), 2019.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES Lymphoscintigraphy is considered a useful tool to optimize sentinel lymph node (SLN) identification. Nonvisualization of the SLN is associated with a lower SLN identification rate. The aim of this study was to identify preoperative factors associated with SLN nonvisualization on lymphoscintigraphy. PATIENTS AND METHODS A total of 2050 consecutive SLN procedures were evaluated from clinically node-negative breast cancer patients. Planar lymphoscintigraphy was performed at 3 h after an intratumoral injection of technetium-99m-nanocolloid. This technique was used for extra-axillary SLN identification. Patient, tumor, and treatment characteristics were analyzed for association with SLN nonvisualization. Factors with a P-value less than 0.1 in univariate analysis were included in a multivariate logistic regression model. RESULTS The SLN visualization rate was 86.7%. In multivariate logistic regression, age of at least 70 years [odds ratio (OR): 3.24; 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.14-4.91)], BMI of at least 30 (OR: 1.93; 95% CI: 1.39-2.69), T3/T4-tumors (OR: 2.70; 95% CI: 1.37-5.32), medially/centrally located tumors (OR: 1.52; 95% CI: 1.17-1.99), previous mantle field radiation (OR: 4.04; 95% CI: 1.74-9.35), nonpalpable tumors (OR: 1.88; 95% CI: 1.36-2.60), and presence of iodine seeds (OR: 1.35; 95% CI: 1.02-1.78) were associated significantly with nonvisualization on lymphoscintigraphy. Nonvisualization was the strongest independent predictor of unsuccessful intraoperative SLN identification (P

Details

ISSN :
01433636
Volume :
40
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Nuclear Medicine Communications
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....9d7b49370be7c74fd85a91556478cb98
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1097/mnm.0000000000000971