Back to Search Start Over

A randomized, open-label study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of liposomal amphotericin B (AmBisome) versus miltefosine in patients with post-kala-azar dermal leishmaniasis

Authors :
Shubhankar Kumar Singh
Sanjiva Bimal
Neena Verma
Roshan Kamal Topno
Pradeep Das
Biplab Pal
Niyamat Ali Siddiqui
Ashish Kumar
Vidya Nand Rabi Das
Vahab Ali
Krishna Pandey
Chandra Shekhar Lal
Source :
Indian journal of dermatology, venereology and leprology. 87(1)
Publication Year :
2019

Abstract

Background: Treatment of post-kala-azar dermal leishmaniasis cases is of paramount importance for kala-azar elimination; however, limited treatment regimens are available as of now. Aim: To compare the effectiveness of liposomal amphotericin B vs miltefosine in post-kala-azar dermal leishmaniasis patients. Methodology: This was a randomized, open-label, parallel-group study. A total of 100 patients of post kala azar dermal leishmaniasis, aged between 5 and 65 years were recruited, 50 patients in each group A (liposomal amphotericin B) and B (miltefosine). Patients were randomized to receive either liposomal amphotericin B (30 mg/kg), six doses each 5 mg/kg, biweekly for 3 weeks or miltefosine 2.5 mg/kg or 100 mg/day for 12 weeks. All the patients were followed at 3rd, 6th and 12th months after the end of the treatment. Results: In the liposomal amphotericin B group, two patients were lost to follow-up, whereas four patients were lost to follow-up in the miltefosine group. The initial cure rate by “intention to treat analysis” was 98% and 100% in liposomal amphotericin B and miltefosine group, respectively. The final cure rate by “per protocol analysis” was 74.5% and 86.9% in liposomal amphotericin B and miltefosine, respectively. Twelve patients (25.5%) in the liposomal amphotericin B group and six patients (13%) in the miltefosine group relapsed. None of the patients in either group developed any serious adverse events. Limitations: Quantitative polymerase chain reaction was not performed at all the follow-up visits and sample sizes. Conclusion: Efficacy of miltefosine was found to be better than liposomal amphotericin B, hence, the use of miltefosine as first-line therapy for post-kala-azar dermal leishmaniasis needs to be continued. However, liposomal amphotericin B could be considered as one of the treatment options for the elimination of kala-azar from the Indian subcontinent.

Details

ISSN :
09733922
Volume :
87
Issue :
1
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Indian journal of dermatology, venereology and leprology
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....9e10d7ce2922bbeadc7d486c2d24b46d