Back to Search Start Over

Evaluating Research Centers in Minority Institutions: Framework, Metrics, Best Practices, and Challenges

Authors :
Angela Sy
Traci Hayes
Kelly Laurila
Carlamarie Noboa
Robbert J. Langwerden
Michelle M. Hospital
Doris A. Andújar-Pérez
Lakesha Stevenson
Suzanne M. Randolph Cunningham
Latrice Rollins
Hala Madanat
Tanya Penn
Shiva Mehravaran
Source :
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Volume 17, Issue 22, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Vol 17, Iss 8373, p 8373 (2020)
Publication Year :
2020
Publisher :
Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute, 2020.

Abstract

The NIH-funded Research Centers in Minority Institutions (RCMI) program is currently funding 18 academic institutions to strengthen the research environment and contribution to health disparities research. The purpose of this multiphase mixed-methods study was to establish a uniform evaluation framework for demonstrating the collective success of this research consortium. Methods included discussions of aims and logic models at the RCMI Evaluators&rsquo<br />Workshop, a literature review to inform an evaluation conceptual framework, and a case study survey to obtain evaluation-related information and metrics. Ten RCMIs participated in the workshop and 14 submitted responses to the survey. The resultant RCMI Evaluation Conceptual Model presents a practical ongoing approach to document RCMIs&rsquo<br />impacts on health disparities. Survey results identified 37 common metrics under four primary categories. Evaluation challenges were issues related to limited human resources, data collection, decision-making, defining metrics, cost-sharing, and revenue-generation. There is a need for further collaborative efforts across RCMI sites to engage program leadership and community stakeholders in addressing the identified evaluation challenges and measurement. Program leadership should be engaged to apply the Evaluation Conceptual Framework and common metrics to allow for valid inter-institutional comparisons and consortium-wide evaluations. Stakeholders could ensure evaluation metrics are used to facilitate community impacts.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
16604601
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....9e8e40bea2ae55cbf829e192c939528e
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17228373