Back to Search
Start Over
Delivery of crop pollination services is an insufficient argument for wild pollinator conservation
- Source :
- Nature Communications 6 (2015), Nature Communications (6), 8 p.. (2015), Nature communications, vol 6, iss 1, Digital.CSIC. Repositorio Institucional del CSIC, instname, Kleijn, D; Winfree, R; Bartomeus, I; Carvalheiro, LG; Henry, M; Isaacs, R; et al.(2015). Delivery of crop pollination services is an insufficient argument for wild pollinator conservation. Nature Communications, 6. doi: 10.1038/ncomms8414. UC Berkeley: Retrieved from: http://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/1717809k, Nature Communications, Nature Communications, Nature Publishing Group, 2015, 6, 8 p. ⟨10.1038/ncomms8414⟩, Kleijn, D, Winfree, R, Bartomeus, I, Carvalheiro, L G, Henry, M, Isaacs, R, Klein, A M, Kremen, C, M'Gonigle, L K, Rader, R, Ricketts, T H, Williams, N M, Lee Adamson, N, Ascher, J S, Báldi, A, Batáry, P, Benjamin, F, Biesmeijer, J C, Blitzer, E J, Bommarco, R, Brand, M R, Bretagnolle, V, Button, L, Cariveau, D P, Chifflet, R, Colville, J F, Danforth, B N, Elle, E, Garratt, M P D, Herzog, F, Holzschuh, A, Howlett, B G, Jauker, F, Jha, S, Knop, E, Krewenka, K M, Le Féon, V, Mandelik, Y, May, E A, Park, M G, Pisanty, G, Reemer, M, Riedinger, V, Rollin, O, Rundlöf, M, Sardiñas, H S, Scheper, J, Sciligo, A R, Smith, H G, Steffan-Dewenter, I, Thorp, R, Tscharntke, T, Verhulst, J, Viana, B F, Vaissière, B E, Veldtman, R, Westphal, C & Potts, S G 2015, ' Delivery of crop pollination services is an insufficient argument for wild pollinator conservation ' Nature Communications, vol 6, 7414 . DOI: 10.1038/ncomms8414, Nature Communications, Nature Publishing Group, 2015, 6, pp.7414-7422. ⟨10.1038/ncomms8414⟩, Kleijn, D, Winfree, R, Bartomeus, I, Carvalheiro, L G, Henry, M, Isaacs, R, Klein, A M, Kremen, C, M'Gonigle, L K, Rader, R, Ricketts, T H, Williams, N M, Lee Adamson, N, Ascher, J S, Báldi, A, Batáry, P, Benjamin, F, Biesmeijer, J C, Blitzer, E J, Bommarco, R, Brand, M R, Bretagnolle, V, Button, L, Cariveau, D P, Chifflet, R, Colville, J F, Danforth, B N, Elle, E, Garratt, M P D, Herzog, F, Holzschuh, A, Howlett, B G, Jauker, F, Jha, S, Knop, E, Krewenka, K M, Le Féon, V, Mandelik, Y, May, E A, Park, M G, Pisanty, G, Reemer, M, Riedinger, V, Rollin, O, Rundlöf, M, Sardiñas, H S, Scheper, J, Sciligo, A R, Smith, H G, Steffan-Dewenter, I, Thorp, R, Tscharntke, T, Verhulst, J, Viana, B F, Vaissière, B E, Veldtman, R, Westphal, C & Potts, S G 2015, ' Delivery of crop pollination services is an insufficient argument for wild pollinator conservation ', Nature Communications, vol. 6, 7414 . https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms8414, Kleijn, D; Winfree, R; Bartomeus, I; Carvalheiro, LG; Henry, M; Rufus Isaacs, R; Klein, AM; Kremen, C; Rader, R; Ricketts, TH; Williams, NM; Adamson, NL; Ascher, JS; Báldi, A; Batáry, P; Benjamin, F; Biesmeijer, JC; Blitzer, EJ; Bommarco, R; Brand, MR; ... (2015). Delivery of crop pollination services is an insufficient argument for wild pollinator conservation. Nature communications, 6(7414), pp. 1-8. Nature Publishing Group 10.1038/ncomms8414
- Publication Year :
- 2015
-
Abstract
- © 2015 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved. There is compelling evidence that more diverse ecosystems deliver greater benefits to people, and these ecosystem services have become a key argument for biodiversity conservation. However, it is unclear how much biodiversity is needed to deliver ecosystem services in a cost-effective way. Here we show that, while the contribution of wild bees to crop production is significant, service delivery is restricted to a limited subset of all known bee species. Across crops, years and biogeographical regions, crop-visiting wild bee communities are dominated by a small number of common species, and threatened species are rarely observed on crops. Dominant crop pollinators persist under agricultural expansion and many are easily enhanced by simple conservation measures, suggesting that cost-effective management strategies to promote crop pollination should target a different set of species than management strategies to promote threatened bees. Conserving the biological diversity of bees therefore requires more than just ecosystem-service-based arguments.
- Subjects :
- Pollination
[SDV]Life Sciences [q-bio]
Biodiversity
General Physics and Astronomy
habitat naturel
decline
Ecosystem services
biodiversité
Common species
Pollinator
2. Zero hunger
abundance
Multidisciplinary
Ecology
native bees
food and beverages
Bees
PE&RC
Pollinator decline
Ecosystems Research
pollen
[SDE]Environmental Sciences
Plantenecologie en Natuurbeheer
Conservation of Natural Resources
productivity
Life on Land
Plant Ecology and Nature Conservation
Crops
conservation de la population
Biology
Article
General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
Animals
fruit-set
ddc:578
Agricultural
pollinisateur
business.industry
pollination
wild pollinator
conservation
fungi
abeille sauvage
butinage
conservation du paysage
General Chemistry
15. Life on land
plant diversity
european countries
Agriculture
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
Threatened species
570 Life sciences
biology
biodiversity conservation
business
ecosystem services
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 20411723
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- Nature Communications 6 (2015), Nature Communications (6), 8 p.. (2015), Nature communications, vol 6, iss 1, Digital.CSIC. Repositorio Institucional del CSIC, instname, Kleijn, D; Winfree, R; Bartomeus, I; Carvalheiro, LG; Henry, M; Isaacs, R; et al.(2015). Delivery of crop pollination services is an insufficient argument for wild pollinator conservation. Nature Communications, 6. doi: 10.1038/ncomms8414. UC Berkeley: Retrieved from: http://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/1717809k, Nature Communications, Nature Communications, Nature Publishing Group, 2015, 6, 8 p. ⟨10.1038/ncomms8414⟩, Kleijn, D, Winfree, R, Bartomeus, I, Carvalheiro, L G, Henry, M, Isaacs, R, Klein, A M, Kremen, C, M'Gonigle, L K, Rader, R, Ricketts, T H, Williams, N M, Lee Adamson, N, Ascher, J S, Báldi, A, Batáry, P, Benjamin, F, Biesmeijer, J C, Blitzer, E J, Bommarco, R, Brand, M R, Bretagnolle, V, Button, L, Cariveau, D P, Chifflet, R, Colville, J F, Danforth, B N, Elle, E, Garratt, M P D, Herzog, F, Holzschuh, A, Howlett, B G, Jauker, F, Jha, S, Knop, E, Krewenka, K M, Le Féon, V, Mandelik, Y, May, E A, Park, M G, Pisanty, G, Reemer, M, Riedinger, V, Rollin, O, Rundlöf, M, Sardiñas, H S, Scheper, J, Sciligo, A R, Smith, H G, Steffan-Dewenter, I, Thorp, R, Tscharntke, T, Verhulst, J, Viana, B F, Vaissière, B E, Veldtman, R, Westphal, C & Potts, S G 2015, ' Delivery of crop pollination services is an insufficient argument for wild pollinator conservation ' Nature Communications, vol 6, 7414 . DOI: 10.1038/ncomms8414, Nature Communications, Nature Publishing Group, 2015, 6, pp.7414-7422. ⟨10.1038/ncomms8414⟩, Kleijn, D, Winfree, R, Bartomeus, I, Carvalheiro, L G, Henry, M, Isaacs, R, Klein, A M, Kremen, C, M'Gonigle, L K, Rader, R, Ricketts, T H, Williams, N M, Lee Adamson, N, Ascher, J S, Báldi, A, Batáry, P, Benjamin, F, Biesmeijer, J C, Blitzer, E J, Bommarco, R, Brand, M R, Bretagnolle, V, Button, L, Cariveau, D P, Chifflet, R, Colville, J F, Danforth, B N, Elle, E, Garratt, M P D, Herzog, F, Holzschuh, A, Howlett, B G, Jauker, F, Jha, S, Knop, E, Krewenka, K M, Le Féon, V, Mandelik, Y, May, E A, Park, M G, Pisanty, G, Reemer, M, Riedinger, V, Rollin, O, Rundlöf, M, Sardiñas, H S, Scheper, J, Sciligo, A R, Smith, H G, Steffan-Dewenter, I, Thorp, R, Tscharntke, T, Verhulst, J, Viana, B F, Vaissière, B E, Veldtman, R, Westphal, C & Potts, S G 2015, ' Delivery of crop pollination services is an insufficient argument for wild pollinator conservation ', Nature Communications, vol. 6, 7414 . https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms8414, Kleijn, D; Winfree, R; Bartomeus, I; Carvalheiro, LG; Henry, M; Rufus Isaacs, R; Klein, AM; Kremen, C; Rader, R; Ricketts, TH; Williams, NM; Adamson, NL; Ascher, JS; Báldi, A; Batáry, P; Benjamin, F; Biesmeijer, JC; Blitzer, EJ; Bommarco, R; Brand, MR; ... (2015). Delivery of crop pollination services is an insufficient argument for wild pollinator conservation. Nature communications, 6(7414), pp. 1-8. Nature Publishing Group 10.1038/ncomms8414 <http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncomms8414>, Nature Communications, 6
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....9f4cba92d58a153b9f5d6f06fb5eb61d
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms8414.