Back to Search Start Over

Navigating the complexity of ecological stability

Authors :
Deirdre McClean
Kevin Healy
Stuart L. Pimm
Helmut Hillebrand
Eoin J. O'Gorman
Nessa E. O'Connor
Andrew L. Jackson
Ian Donohue
Mike S. Fowler
Qiang Yang
José M. Montoya
Owen L. Petchey
Miguel Lurgi
Trinity College Dublin
University of Oldenburg
Station d'écologie théorique et expérimentale (SETE)
Université Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier (UT3)
Université Fédérale Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées-Université Fédérale Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées-Observatoire Midi-Pyrénées (OMP)
Météo France-Centre National d'Études Spatiales [Toulouse] (CNES)-Université Fédérale Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD)-Météo France-Centre National d'Études Spatiales [Toulouse] (CNES)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)
Universität Zürich [Zürich] = University of Zurich (UZH)
Duke University [Durham]
Swansea University
University of Adelaide
Queen's University [Belfast] (QUB)
Imperial College London
University of Zurich
Source :
Donohue, I, Hillebrand, H, Montoya, J M, Petchey, O L, Pimm, S L, Fowler, M S, Healy, K, Jackson, A L, Lurgi, M, McClean, D, O'Connor, N, O'Gorman, E J & Yang, Q 2016, ' Navigating the complexity of ecological stability ', Ecology Letters, vol. 19, no. 9, pp. 1172–1185 . https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.12648, Ecology Letters, Ecology Letters, Wiley, 2016, 19 (9), pp.1172-1185. ⟨10.1111/ele.12648⟩
Publication Year :
2016
Publisher :
Wiley, 2016.

Abstract

International audience; Human actions challenge nature in many ways. Ecological responses are ineluctably complex, demanding measures that describe them succinctly. Collectively, these measures encapsulate the overall ‘stability’ of the system. Many international bodies, including the Intergovernmental Science‐Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services, broadly aspire to maintain or enhance ecological stability. Such bodies frequently use terms pertaining to stability that lack clear definition. Consequently, we cannot measure them and so they disconnect from a large body of theoretical and empirical understanding. We assess the scientific and policy literature and show that this disconnect is one consequence of an inconsistent and one‐dimensional approach that ecologists have taken to both disturbances and stability. This has led to confused communication of the nature of stability and the level of our insight into it. Disturbances and stability are multidimensional. Our understanding of them is not. We have a remarkably poor understanding of the impacts on stability of the characteristics that define many, perhaps all, of the most important elements of global change. We provide recommendations for theoreticians, empiricists and policymakers on how to better integrate the multidimensional nature of ecological stability into their research, policies and actions.

Details

ISSN :
1461023X and 14610248
Volume :
19
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Ecology Letters
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....9f512d77b3f9fe3b7ed26939baf0ba97
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.12648