Back to Search Start Over

Vedolizumab versus Adalimumab for moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis

Authors :
IVARS TOLMANIS
FABIANA CASTIGLIONE
Jingjing Chen
Vladimir Rafalskiy
Xavier Roblin
Can Gönen
Edward Loftus
Bruce Sands
Pavel Kohout
Silvio Danese
Ewa Malecka-Wojciesko
ENGIN ALTINTAS
Srdjan Djuranovic
Jaroslaw Regula
Laurent Peyrin-biroulet
Klaus Theede
Sands, B. E.
Peyrin-Biroulet, L.
Loftus, E. V.
Danese, S.
Colombel, J. -F.
Toruner, M.
Jonaitis, L.
Abhyankar, B.
Chen, J.
Rogers, R.
Lirio, R. A.
Bornstein, J. D.
Schreiber, S Varsity Study Group
Romano, M.
RS: NUTRIM - R2 - Liver and digestive health
MUMC+: MA Maag Darm Lever (9)
Interne Geneeskunde
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai [New York] (MSSM)
Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Nancy (CHRU Nancy)
Mayo Clinic [Rochester]
Humanitas Clinical and Research Center [Rozzano, Milan, Italy]
University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein [Kiel, Germany]
Sands BE, Peyrin-Biroulet L, Loftus EV Jr, Danese S, Colombel JF, Törüner M, Jonaitis L, Abhyankar B, Chen J, Rogers R, Lirio RA, Bornstein JD, Schreiber S
Gionchetti P ..
Sands, Be
Peyrin-Biroulet, L
Loftus, Ev
Danese, S
Colombel, Jf
Toruner, M
Jonaitis, L
Abhyankar, B
Chen, J
Rogers, R
Lirio, Ra
Bornstein, Jd
Schreiber, S
Source :
New England Journal of Medicine, 381(13), 1215-1226. MASSACHUSETTS MEDICAL SOCIETY, New England Journal of Medicine, New England Journal of Medicine, Massachusetts Medical Society, 2019, 381 (13), pp.1215-1226. ⟨10.1056/NEJMoa1905725⟩
Publication Year :
2019

Abstract

Background: Biologic therapies are widely used in patients with ulcerative colitis. Head-to-head trials of these therapies in patients with inflammatory bowel disease are lacking. Methods: In a phase 3b, double-blind, double-dummy, randomized trial conducted at 245 centers in 34 countries, we compared vedolizumab with adalimumab in adults with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis to determine whether vedolizumab was superior. Previous exposure to a tumor necrosis factor inhibitor other than adalimumab was allowed in up to 25% of patients. The patients were assigned to receive infusions of 300 mg of vedolizumab on day 1 and at weeks 2, 6, 14, 22, 30, 38, and 46 (plus injections of placebo) or subcutaneous injections of 40 mg of adalimumab, with a total dose of 160 mg at week 1, 80 mg at week 2, and 40 mg every 2 weeks thereafter until week 50 (plus infusions of placebo). Dose escalation was not permitted in either group. The primary outcome was clinical remission at week 52 (defined as a total score of ≤2 on the Mayo scale [range, 0 to 12, with higher scores indicating more severe disease] and no subscore >1 [range, 0 to 3] on any of the four Mayo scale components). To control for type I error, efficacy outcomes were analyzed with a hierarchical testing procedure, with the variables in the following order: clinical remission, endoscopic improvement (subscore of 0 to 1 on the Mayo endoscopic component), and corticosteroid- free remission at week 52. Results: A total of 769 patients underwent randomization and received at least one dose of vedolizumab (383 patients) or adalimumab (386 patients). At week 52, clinical remission was observed in a higher percentage of patients in the vedolizumab group than in the adalimumab group (31.3% vs. 22.5% ; difference, 8.8 percentage points ; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.5 to 15.0 ; P = 0.006), as was endoscopic improvement (39.7% vs. 27.7% ; difference, 11.9 percentage points ; 95% CI, 5.3 to 18.5 ; P

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
00284793 and 15334406
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
New England Journal of Medicine, 381(13), 1215-1226. MASSACHUSETTS MEDICAL SOCIETY, New England Journal of Medicine, New England Journal of Medicine, Massachusetts Medical Society, 2019, 381 (13), pp.1215-1226. ⟨10.1056/NEJMoa1905725⟩
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....9ff9d0aca4d3f9bf57a004d11ce3b9f4
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1905725⟩