Back to Search Start Over

Improving methodological standards in behavioral interventions for cognitive enhancement

Authors :
Mor Nahum
Torkel Klingberg
Dennis M. Levi
Susan E. Gathercole
Tilo Strobach
Lorenza S. Colzato
Simone Kühn
Elizabeth Tipton
Nora S. Newcombe
Torsten Schubert
Paolo Ghisletta
Ulrich Ansorge
Adam Gazzaley
C. Shawn Green
Julie Loebach Wetherell
Susanne M. Jaeggi
Arthur F. Kramer
Andrea Facoetti
Simone Gori
Bernhard Hommel
Anne Collins McLaughlin
Aaron R. Seitz
Anna Wexler
Albert Rizzo
Ulrike Bingel
Daphne Bavelier
Haley A. Vlach
Martha Clare Morris
Alan Kingstone
Philipp Kanske
Rogerio Panizzutti
Julia Karbach
Ruchika Shaurya Prakash
Isabela Granic
Xin Tong
Michael S.C. Thomas
Claudia M. Witt
Karlene Ball
Richard E. Mayer
Jason Chein
Charles H. Hillman
James D. Slotta
Ilina Singh
Jerri D. Edwards
Matthias Kliegel
Danielle S. McNamara
Sarah J. Short
Sophia Vinogradov
Source :
Journal of Cognitive Enhancement, 3, 1, pp. 2-29, Journal of Cognitive Enhancement, Vol. 3, No 1 (2019) pp. 2-29, Journal of Cognitive Enhancement, 3, 2-29, Journal of Cognitive Enhancement, Journal of Cognitive Enhancement, 3(1), 2-29
Publication Year :
2019

Abstract

Contains fulltext : 207229.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Closed access) There is substantial interest in the possibility that cognitive skills can be improved by dedicated behavioral training. Yet despite the large amount of work being conducted in this domain, there is not an explicit and widely agreed upon consensus around the best methodological practices. This document seeks to fill this gap. We start from the perspective that there are many types of studies that are important in this domain - e.g., feasibility, mechanistic, efficacy, and effectiveness. These studies have fundamentally different goals, and, as such, the best-practice methods to meet those goals will also differ. We thus make suggestions in topics ranging from the design and implementation of control groups, to reporting of results, to dissemination and communication, taking the perspective that the best practices are not necessarily uniform across all study types. We also explicitly recognize and discuss the fact that there are methodological issues around which we currently lack the theoretical and/or empirical foundation to determine best practices (e.g., as pertains to assessing participant expectations). For these, we suggest important routes forward, including greater interdisciplinary collaboration with individuals from domains that face related concerns. Our hope is that these recommendations will greatly increase the rate at which science in this domain advances. 28 p.

Details

ISSN :
25093290
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Journal of Cognitive Enhancement, 3, 1, pp. 2-29, Journal of Cognitive Enhancement, Vol. 3, No 1 (2019) pp. 2-29, Journal of Cognitive Enhancement, 3, 2-29, Journal of Cognitive Enhancement, Journal of Cognitive Enhancement, 3(1), 2-29
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....a09faaa98290c2d9e05c14aa08422528