Back to Search Start Over

A Prospective Multicenter Study Evaluating Learning Curves and Competence in Endoscopic Ultrasound and Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Among Advanced Endoscopy Trainees: The Rapid Assessment of Trainee Endoscopy Skills Study

Authors :
Patrick Yachimski
Linda Carlin
Seng-Ian Gan
V. Raman Muthusamy
Andrew Dries
Laura Rosenkranz
Dayna S. Early
Rajesh N. Keswani
Sarah M. Hyder
Jonathan P Gaspar
Sachin Wani
Ashley L. Faulx
Amitabh Chak
Larissa L. Fujii-Lau
Samuel Han
Raj J. Shah
Andrew Y. Wang
Christopher J. DiMaio
Mojtaba Olyaee
Chitiki Gautamy
Rawad Mounzer
Kimberley Fairley
Ihab I. El-Hajj
Ross Jones
Rabindra R. Watson
Stephen Kim
Steven A. Edmundowicz
Linda S Lee
Brian C. Brauer
Dennis Yang
Swan Ellert
Dan Collins
Daniel Mullady
David L. Diehl
Jayaprakash Sreenarasimhaiah
Robert H. Wilson
Fadi Rzouq
Cynthia L. Harris
Patrick R. Pfau
Andrew J. Walker
Violette C. Simon
Matthew Hall
Srinadh Komanduri
Aaron J. Small
Cyrus Piraka
Gregory A. Cote
Aditi Saxena
Meer Akbar Ali
Srinivas Gaddam
Amit Rastogi
Ryan Law
Stuart C Gordon
Shreyas Saligram
Source :
Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology. 15:1758-1767.e11
Publication Year :
2017
Publisher :
Elsevier BV, 2017.

Abstract

Background & Aims On the basis of the Next Accreditation System, trainee assessment should occur on a continuous basis with individualized feedback. We aimed to validate endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) learning curves among advanced endoscopy trainees (AETs) by using a large national sample of training programs and to develop a centralized database that allows assessment of performance in relation to peers. Methods ASGE recognized training programs were invited to participate, and AETs were graded on ERCP and EUS exams by using a validated competency assessment tool that assesses technical and cognitive competence in a continuous fashion. Grading for each skill was done by using a 4-point scoring system, and a comprehensive data collection and reporting system was built to create learning curves by using cumulative sum analysis. Individual results and benchmarking to peers were shared with AETs and trainers quarterly. Results Of the 62 programs invited, 20 programs and 22 AETs participated in this study. At the end of training, median number of EUS and ERCP performed/AET was 300 (range, 155–650) and 350 (125–500), respectively. Overall, 3786 exams were graded (EUS, 1137; ERCP-biliary, 2280; ERCP-pancreatic, 369). Learning curves for individual end points and overall technical/cognitive aspects in EUS and ERCP demonstrated substantial variability and were successfully shared with all programs. The majority of trainees achieved overall technical (EUS, 82%; ERCP, 60%) and cognitive (EUS, 76%; ERCP, 100%) competence at conclusion of training. Conclusions These results demonstrate the feasibility of establishing a centralized database to report individualized learning curves and confirm the substantial variability in time to achieve competence among AETs in EUS and ERCP. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02509416.

Details

ISSN :
15423565
Volume :
15
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....a0c1ab4dbd9644ec7db773db9c0573a2