Back to Search
Start Over
True versus false parasite interactions: a robust method to take risk factors into account and its application to feline viruses
- Source :
- PLoS ONE, PLoS ONE, Public Library of Science, 2012, 7 (1), pp.e29618. ⟨10.1371/journal.pone.0029618⟩, PLoS ONE, 2012, 7 (1), pp.e29618. ⟨10.1371/journal.pone.0029618⟩, PLoS ONE, Vol 7, Iss 1, p e29618 (2012)
- Publication Year :
- 2012
- Publisher :
- HAL CCSD, 2012.
-
Abstract
- International audience; BACKGROUND: Multiple infections are common in natural host populations and interspecific parasite interactions are therefore likely within a host individual. As they may seriously impact the circulation of certain parasites and the emergence and management of infectious diseases, their study is essential. In the field, detecting parasite interactions is rendered difficult by the fact that a large number of co-infected individuals may also be observed when two parasites share common risk factors. To correct for these "false interactions", methods accounting for parasite risk factors must be used. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: In the present paper we propose such a method for presence-absence data (i.e., serology). Our method enables the calculation of the expected frequencies of single and double infected individuals under the independence hypothesis, before comparing them to the observed ones using the chi-square statistic. The method is termed "the corrected chi-square." Its robustness was compared to a pre-existing method based on logistic regression and the corrected chi-square proved to be much more robust for small sample sizes. Since the logistic regression approach is easier to implement, we propose as a rule of thumb to use the latter when the ratio between the sample size and the number of parameters is above ten. Applied to serological data for four viruses infecting cats, the approach revealed pairwise interactions between the Feline Herpesvirus, Parvovirus and Calicivirus, whereas the infection by FIV, the feline equivalent of HIV, did not modify the risk of infection by any of these viruses. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: This work therefore points out possible interactions that can be further investigated in experimental conditions and, by providing a user-friendly R program and a tutorial example, offers new opportunities for animal and human epidemiologists to detect interactions of interest in the field, a crucial step in the challenge of multiple infections.
- Subjects :
- Male
Pathology
Non-Clinical Medicine
Epidemiology
[SDV]Life Sciences [q-bio]
Veterinary Microbiology
lcsh:Medicine
MESH: Logistic Models
Logistic regression
0302 clinical medicine
Risk Factors
MESH: Risk Factors
MESH: Animals
lcsh:Science
Statistic
0303 health sciences
Multidisciplinary
Ecology
biology
Risk of infection
3. Good health
Community Ecology
Veterinary Diseases
Medicine
MESH: Cats
Research Article
medicine.medical_specialty
Clinical Research Design
030231 tropical medicine
Computational biology
Microbiology
MESH: Host-Parasite Interactions
Veterinary Epidemiology
Host-Parasite Interactions
03 medical and health sciences
Virology
Chi-square test
medicine
Animals
Humans
False Positive Reactions
Serologic Tests
Biology
030304 developmental biology
Health Care Policy
Models, Statistical
MESH: Humans
Population Biology
MESH: False Positive Reactions
Parvovirus
lcsh:R
MESH: Serologic Tests
Computational Biology
Robustness (evolution)
biology.organism_classification
MESH: Male
Logistic Models
Sample size determination
Cats
Veterinary Science
lcsh:Q
Pairwise comparison
MESH: Models, Statistical
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 19326203
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- PLoS ONE, PLoS ONE, Public Library of Science, 2012, 7 (1), pp.e29618. ⟨10.1371/journal.pone.0029618⟩, PLoS ONE, 2012, 7 (1), pp.e29618. ⟨10.1371/journal.pone.0029618⟩, PLoS ONE, Vol 7, Iss 1, p e29618 (2012)
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....a17c4713280f879af79c6a93370cfcdb