Back to Search Start Over

Sex-specific genome-wide association study in glioma identifies new risk locus at 3p21.31 in females, and finds sex-differences in risk at 8q24.21

Authors :
Ostrom, Quinn T.
Kinnersley, Ben
Wrensch, Margaret R.
Eckel-Passow, Jeanette E.
Armstrong, Georgina
Rice, Terri
Chen, Yanwen
Wiencke, John K.
McCoy, Lucie S.
Hansen, Helen M.
Amos, Christopher I.
Bernstein, Jonine L.
Claus, Elizabeth B.
Il’yasova, Dora
Johansen, Christoffer
Lachance, Daniel H.
Lai, Rose K.
Merrell, Ryan T.
Olson, Sara H.
Sadetzki, Siegel
Schildkraut, Joellen M.
Shete, Sanjay
Rubin, Joshua B.
Lathia, Justin D.
Berens, Michael E.
Andersson, Ulrika
Rajaraman, Preetha
Chanock, Stephen J.
Linet, Martha S.
Wang, Zhaoming
Yeager, Meredith
Houlston, Richard S.
Jenkins, Robert B.
Melin, Beatrice
Bondy, Melissa L.
Barnholtz-Sloan, Jill. S.
Publication Year :
2017
Publisher :
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, 2017.

Abstract

Incidence of glioma is approximately 50% higher in males. Previous analyses have examined exposures related to sex hormones in women as potential protective factors for these tumors, with inconsistent results. Previous glioma genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have not stratified by sex. Potential sex-specific genetic effects were assessed in autosomal SNPs and sex chromosome variants for all glioma, GBM and non-GBM patients using data from four previous glioma GWAS. Datasets were analyzed using sex-stratified logistic regression models and combined using meta-analysis. There were 4,831 male cases, 5,216 male controls, 3,206 female cases and 5,470 female controls. A significant association was detected at rs11979158 (7p11.2) in males only. Association at rs55705857 (8q24.21) was stronger in females than in males. A large region on 3p21.31 was identified with significant association in females only. The identified differences in effect of risk variants do not fully explain the observed incidence difference in glioma by sex.

Details

Database :
OpenAIRE
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....a34d41d91f7506dab814fb9456dd9ece
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1101/229112