Back to Search Start Over

One‐year COVID‐19 outcomes on the oncology care patient pathway: Results of a French descriptive, cross‐sectional comprehensive study (ONCOCARE‐COV)

Authors :
Léonard Laurent
Mathias Brugel
Claire Carlier
Florentin Clere
Aurélie Bertrand
Damien Botsen
Camille Boulagnon‐Rombi
Véronique Dalstein
Adeline Debreuve‐Theresette
Sophie Deguelte
Christian Garbar
Rachid Mahmoudi
Antonin Marechal
David Morland
Jean‐Baptiste Rey
Claire Schvartz
Catherine Vallet
Yacine Merrouche
Florian Slimano
Olivier Bouché
Institut Jean Godinot [Reims]
UNICANCER
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Reims (CHU Reims)
Pathologies Pulmonaires et Plasticité Cellulaire - UMR-S 1250 (P3CELL)
Université de Reims Champagne-Ardenne (URCA)-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)
Université de Reims Champagne-Ardenne (URCA)
Centre de Recherche en Sciences et Technologies de l'Information et de la Communication - EA 3804 (CRESTIC)
Passat, Nicolas
Source :
Cancer Medicine, Cancer Medicine, In press, ⟨10.1002/cam4.4817⟩
Publication Year :
2023
Publisher :
HAL CCSD, 2023.

Abstract

International audience; Background: The COVID-19 pandemic led to a widely documented disruption in cancer care pathway. Since a resurgence of the pandemic was expected after the first lockdown in France, the global impact on the cancer care pathway over the year 2020 was investigated.Aims: This study aimed to describe the changes in the oncology care pathway for cancer screening, diagnosis, assessment, diagnosis annoucement procedure and treatment over a one-year period.Materials & Methods: The ONCOCARE-COV study was a comprehensive, retrospective, descriptive, and cross-sectional study comparing the years 2019 and 2020. All key indicators along the cancer care pathway assessing the oncological activity over four periods were described. This study was set in a high-volume, public, single tertiary care center divided in two complementary sites (Reims University Hospital and Godinot Cancer Institute, Reims, France) which was located in a high COVID-19 incidence area during both peaks of the outbreak.Results: A total of 26,566 patient's files were active during the year 2020. Breast screening (−19.5%), announcement dedicated consultations (−9.2%), Intravenous and Hyperthermic Intraoperative Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPECs) (−25%), and oncogeriatric evaluations (−14.8%) were heavily disrupted in regard to 2020 activity. We identified a clear second outbreak wave impact on medical announcement procedures (October, −14.4%), radiotherapy sessions (October, −16%), number of new health record discussed in multidisciplinary tumor board meeting (November, −14.6%) and HIPECs (November, −100%). Moreover, 2020 cancer care activity stagnated compared to 2019.Discussion: The oncological care pathway was heavily disrupted during the first and second peaks of the COVID-19 outbreak. Between lockdowns, we observed a remarkable but non-compensatory recovery as well as a lesser impact from the pandemic resurgence. However, in absence of an increase in activity, a backlog persisted.Conclusion: Public health efforts are needed to deal with the consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic on the oncology care pathway.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
20457634
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Cancer Medicine, Cancer Medicine, In press, ⟨10.1002/cam4.4817⟩
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....a3f27026ed222aa54df58fb82f5066b5
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.4817⟩