Sorry, I don't understand your search. ×
Back to Search Start Over

The Brachiocephalic Vein as a Safe and Viable Alternative to Internal Jugular Vein for Central Venous Cannulation

Authors :
D. Mamo
Massimo Zambon
Giacomo Monti
Simona Silvetti
Rosalba Lembo
Paolo Beccaria
Alberto Zangrillo
Giovanni Landoni
Beccaria, Paolo Federico
Silvetti, Simona
Lembo, Rosalba
Landoni, Giovanni
Monti, Giacomo
Zambon, Massimo
Mamo, Daniela
Zangrillo, Alberto
Source :
Anesthesia & Analgesia. 127:146-150
Publication Year :
2018
Publisher :
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health), 2018.

Abstract

Background Although many studies have compared success and complication rates for central line insertion sites with and without ultrasound, few have examined the use of the brachiocephalic vein for central venous access. The aim of this study was to describe the brachiocephalic vein as an alternative site for elective ultrasound vascular cannulation in adults, and to compare it with the more commonly used internal jugular vein site in terms of procedural difficulties, first pass failure rate, overall failure rate, and safety. Methods In this single-center, retrospective cohort study, clinical data from consecutive adult patients undergoing elective ultrasound-guided central venous catheterization of upper body were retrieved from the department database. All of these central venous catheters were requested by department team, none was positioned for surgery. Seven hundred nine patients underwent central venous catheterization via the internal jugular approach and 285 patients via the brachiocephalic route. Patients catheterized via the brachiocephalic vein approach were then compared with those catheterized via the internal jugular vein in terms of ease of catheterization, success rate, and complications. Differences between approaches were assessed by univariate analyses and multivariable analysis. Results Overall, 994 patients underwent central venous catheterization. A total of 87% had a successful catheter implantation at the first attempt, 6.7% of insertions were difficult, 5.7% were complicated, and 3.4% failed. Procedural difficulty was more frequent with the internal jugular than with the brachiocephalic approach (odds ratio, 0.38; 95% confidence interval, 0.19-0.76; P = .007) after correction for potential confounders. Differences between groups in complication rate (6.3% vs 4.1%) or failure rate (3.4% vs 3.5%) were not significant. Conclusions Brachiocephalic cannulation is a reasonable alternative to ultrasound-guided internal jugular vein catheterization.

Details

ISSN :
00032999
Volume :
127
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Anesthesia & Analgesia
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....a40f88ad143e7420f95d60aea0e6600a
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1213/ane.0000000000003357