Back to Search
Start Over
A Quantitative Approach to Determining the Ideal Female Lip Aesthetic and Its Effect on Facial Attractiveness
- Source :
- JAMA Facial Plastic Surgery. 19:261-267
- Publication Year :
- 2017
- Publisher :
- Mary Ann Liebert Inc, 2017.
-
Abstract
- Aesthetic proportions of the lips and their effect on facial attractiveness are poorly defined. Established guidelines would aid practitioners in achieving optimal aesthetic outcomes during cosmetic augmentation.To assess the most attractive lip dimensions of white women based on attractiveness ranking of surface area, ratio of upper to lower lip, and dimensions of the lip surface area relative to the lower third of the face.In phase 1 of this study, synthetic morph frontal digital images of the faces of 20 white women ages 18 to 25 years old were used to generate 5 varied lip surface areas for each face. These 100 faces were cardinally ranked by attractiveness through our developed conventional and internet-based focus groups by 150 participants. A summed ranking score of each face was plotted to quantify the most attractive surface area. In phase 2 of the study, 4 variants for each face were created with 15 of the most attractive images manipulating upper to lower lip ratios while maintaining the most attractive surface area from phase 1. A total of 60 faces were created, and each ratio was ranked by attractiveness by 428 participants (internet-based focus groups). In phase 3, the surface area from the most attractive faces was used to determine the total lip surface area relative to the lower facial third. Data were collected from March 1 to November 31, 2010, and analyzed from June 1 to October 31, 2016.Most attractive lip surface area, ratio of upper to lower lip, and dimension of the lips relative to the lower facial third.In phase 1, all 100 faces were cardinally ranked by 150 individuals (internet-based focus groups [n = 130] and raters from conventional focus groups [conventional raters] [n = 20]). In phase 2, all 60 faces were cardinally ranked by 428 participants (internet-based focus groups [n = 408] and conventional raters [n = 20]). The surface area that corresponded to the range of 2.0 to 2.5 × 104 pixels represented the highest summed rank, generating a pool of 14 images. This surface area was determined to be the most attractive and corresponded to a 53.5% increase in surface area from the original image. With the highest mean and highest proportions of most attractive rankings, the 1:2 ratio was deemed most attractive. Conversely, the ratio of 2:1 was deemed least attractive, having the lowest mean at 1.61 and the highest proportion of ranks within 1 with 310 votes (72.3%).Using a robust sample size, this study found that the most attractive lip surface area represents a 53.5% increase from baseline, an upper to lower lip ratio of 1:2, and a surface area equal to 9.6% of the lower third of the face. Lip dimensions and ratios derived in this study may provide guidelines in improving overall facial aesthetics and have clinical relevance to the field of facial plastic surgery.NA.
- Subjects :
- Adolescent
Esthetics
Cephalometry
media_common.quotation_subject
030230 surgery
Choice Behavior
Facial recognition system
Beauty
Young Adult
03 medical and health sciences
0302 clinical medicine
stomatognathic system
Facial attractiveness
Humans
Surgery, Plastic
030223 otorhinolaryngology
Original Investigation
media_common
Internet
Ideal (set theory)
Focus Groups
Lip
stomatognathic diseases
Patient Satisfaction
Face
Female
Surgery
Psychology
Facial Recognition
Social psychology
Subjects
Details
- ISSN :
- 21686092 and 21686076
- Volume :
- 19
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- JAMA Facial Plastic Surgery
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....a495c877a8cc6b4ae5c4df17b8b7930b
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1001/jamafacial.2016.2049