Back to Search Start Over

Korean Shock Society septic shock registry: a preliminary report

Authors :
Gil Joon Suh
Sung Phil Chung
Kap Su Han
Young Seon Joo
Kyuseok Kim
Tae Ho Lim
Sung-Hyuk Choi
Sung Yeon Hwang
Seung Mok Ryoo
Jin Ho Beom
Won Young Kim
Han Sung Choi
You Hwan Jo
Woon Yong Kwon
Tae Gun Shin
Young Hoon Yoon
Gu Hyun Kang
Source :
Clinical and Experimental Emergency Medicine
Publication Year :
2017
Publisher :
The Korean Society of Emergency Medicine, 2017.

Abstract

Objective To evaluate the clinical characteristics, therapeutic interventions, and outcomes of patients with septic shock admitted to the emergency department (ED). Methods This study was a preliminary, descriptive analysis of a prospective, multi-center, observational registry of the EDs of 10 hospitals participating in the Korean Shock Society. Patients aged 19 years or older who had a suspected or confirmed infection and evidence of refractory hypotension or hypoperfusion were included. Results A total of 468 patients were enrolled (median age, 71.3 years; male, 55.1%; refractory hypotension, 82.9%; hyperlactatemia without hypotension, 17.1%). Respiratory infection was the most common source of infection (31.0%). The median Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment score was 7.5. The sepsis bundle compliance was 91.2% for lactate measurement, 70.3% for blood culture, 68.4% for antibiotic administration, 80.3% for fluid resuscitation, 97.8% for vasopressor application, 68.0% for central venous pressure measurement, 22.0% for central venous oxygen saturation measurement, and 59.2% for repeated lactate measurement. Among patients who underwent interventions for source control (n=117, 25.1%), 43 (36.8%) received interventions within 12 hours of ED arrival. The in-hospital, 28-day, and 90-day mortality rates were 22.9%, 21.8%, and 27.1%, respectively. The median ED and hospital lengths of stay were 6.8 hours and 12 days, respectively. Conclusion This preliminary report revealed a mortality of over 20% in patients with septic shock, which suggests that there are areas for improvement in terms of the quality of initial resuscitation and outcomes of septic shock patients in the ED.

Details

ISSN :
23834625
Volume :
4
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Clinical and Experimental Emergency Medicine
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....a62410cc2555370c72c6421149b16aa6