Back to Search Start Over

Programmed Cell Death Ligand 1 in Breast Cancer: Technical Aspects, Prognostic Implications, and Predictive Value

Authors :
Gaia Griguolo
Federica Miglietta
Maria Vittoria Dieci
Valentina Guarneri
Source :
The Oncologist
Publication Year :
2019
Publisher :
Oxford University Press (OUP), 2019.

Abstract

This article presents a comprehensive review of the current evidence related to PD‐L1 testing in breast cancer and its use as a biomarker in prediction of response to immunotherapies.<br />In the light of recent advances in the immunotherapy field for breast cancer (BC) treatment, especially in the triple‐negative subtype, the identification of reliable biomarkers capable of improving patient selection is paramount, because only a portion of patients seem to derive benefit from this appealing treatment strategy. In this context, the role of programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD‐L1) as a potential prognostic and/or predictive biomarker has been intensively explored, with controversial results. The aim of the present review is to collect available evidence on the biological relevance and clinical utility of PD‐L1 expression in BC, with particular emphasis on technical aspects, prognostic implications, and predictive value of this promising biomarker. Implications for Practice. In the light of the promising results coming from trials of immune checkpoint inhibitors for breast cancer treatment, the potential predictive and/or prognostic role of programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD‐L1) in breast cancer has gained increasing interest. This review provides clinicians with an overview of the available clinical evidence regarding PD‐L1 as a biomarker in breast cancer, focusing on both data with a possible direct impact on clinic and methodological pitfalls that need to be addressed in order to optimize PD‐L1 implementation as a clinically useful tool for breast cancer management.

Details

ISSN :
1549490X and 10837159
Volume :
24
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
The Oncologist
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....a65127ca57b405bcfab3bc26638b6509
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1634/theoncologist.2019-0197