3d finite element analysis of rotary instruments in root canal dentine with different elastic moduli

Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-25T11:13:26Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 Previous issue date: 2021-03-02 The aim of the present investigation was to calculate the stress distribution generated in the root dentine canal during mechanical rotation of five different NiTi endodontic instruments by means of a finite element analysis (FEA). Two conventional alloy NiTi instruments F360 25/04 and F6 Skytaper 25/06, in comparison to three heat treated alloys NiTI Hyflex CM 25/04, Protaper Next 25/06 and One Curve 25/06 were considered and analyzed. The instruments’ flexibility (reaction force) and geometrical features (cross section, conicity) were previously investigated. For each instrument, dentine root canals with two different elastic moduli(18 and 42 GPa) were simulated with defined apical ratios. Ten different CAD instrument models were created and their mechanical behaviors were analyzed by a 3D-FEA. Static structural analyses were performed with a non-failure condition, since a linear elastic behavior was assumed for all components. All the instruments generated a stress area concentration in correspondence to the root canal curvature at approx. 7 mm from the apex. The maximum values were found when instruments were analyzed in the highest elastic modulus dentine canal. Strain and von Mises stress patterns showed a higher concentration in the first part of curved radius of all the instruments. Conventional Ni-Ti endodontic instruments demonstrated higher stress magnitudes, regardless of the conicity of 4% and 6%, and they showed the highest von Mises stress values in sound, as well as in mineralized dentine canals. Heat-treated endodontic instruments with higher flexibility values showed a reduced stress concentration map. Hyflex CM 25/04 displayed the lowest von Mises stress values of, respectively, 35.73 and 44.30 GPa for sound and mineralized dentine. The mechanical behavior of all rotary endodontic instruments was influenced by the different elastic moduli and by the dentine canal rigidity. Endodontic Clinical Section Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences School of Dentistry University of Bologna-Alma Mater Studiorum University of Taubaté (UNITAU), Taubaté Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics Institute of Science and Technology São Paulo State University—UNESP Department of Chemical Materials and Industrial Production Engineering University of Naples Federico II and the Center for Advanced Biomaterials for HealthCare@CRIB Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia School of Dentistry University of Naples Federico II Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics Institute of Science and Technology São Paulo State University—UNESP