Dorsal lumbotomy for pediatric upper pole hemi-nephrectomy: Back (door) to the future?

Summary Introduction Upper pole heminephrectomy (UHN) is performed for two main indications in children: ectopic ureterocele and duplication anomalies with upper pole ectopy, both in the context of a poorly functioning upper pole moiety. Current popular techniques for conducting UHN include laparoscopic (LPN) and robot-assisted laparoscopic (RAPN). Objective To evaluate outcomes following dorsal lumbotomy (DL), an open approach used historically for pyeloplasty and pyelolithotomy, and in which no clinical trials or exclusive case-series have been conducted for upper pole hemi-nephrectomy (UHN) in children. We ultimately aim to compare our outcomes following DL at our centre to that of published outcomes of minimally invasive approaches to UHN. Study design Institutional board review was obtained (H18-03716) for a retrospective review of 50 UHN performed in 49 consecutive pediatric patients using the DL approach by a single surgeon between 2001 and 2019. Clinical variables and indicators included age, sex, weight, skin-to-skin time, total operating room time, duration of hospital stay, post-operative complications, analgesic requirements, and post-operative ultrasound results. Results Of 50 UHN performed, 23 had a presurgical diagnosis of ectopic ureter, and 27 ureterocele. Mean weight of patients was 12.61 kg, and the mean age at surgery was 24.55 months. Mean (range) for time between skin incision and closure was 88.5 (62–132) minutes, and the mean (range) total operating room time was 138.5 (70–180) minutes. There were neither intraoperative complications nor transfusions. The mean (range) post-operative opioid delivered was 0.73 (0.00–2.00) mg/kg/day. Mean (range) post-operative ibuprofen delivered was 5.41 (0.00–37.73) mg/kg/day. Median length of hospital stay was 2 days. No patient received post-operative prescriptions for narcotics at discharge. There were no wound complications. One patient had secondary atrophy of the lower pole. Secondary lower tract surgery, unrelated to surgical approach, was performed in five patients. Ten patients experienced a urinary tract infection at some point after surgery. Conclusion DL is safe, feasible, and produces operative outcomes and times comparable to that of laparoscopic and robotic techniques. These findings as well as operative costs should be considered when selecting a surgical technique for UHN. Summary . Patients' demographics, operative and post-operative characteristics Age, months, mean ± SD (range) 24.55 ± 24.00 (5–132) Weight, kg, mean ± SD (range) 12.61 ± 5.35 (6.90–31.00) Time between skin incision and closure (skin-to-skin), min 88.51 ± 16.79 (62–132) Total operating room time, min 138.46 ± 24.60 (70–180) Length of hospital stay, days 2.55 ± 0.74 (2–5) Follow-up, months 22.25 ± 35.88 (1.70–179.03) Post-operative opioid (mg/kg/day) 0.73 ± 0.44 Post-operative acetaminophen (mg/kg/day) 66.51 ± 21.03 Post-operative ibuprofen (mg/kg/day) 5.41 ± 9.72 Values are described as “mean ± standard deviation (range, if applicable)”.