Back to Search
Start Over
The low-mass end of the baryonic Tully-Fisher relation
- Source :
- NASA Astrophysics Data System, MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY (ISSN 0035-8711), 464(2), 2419-2428, Monthly notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 2017, Vol.464(2), pp.2419-2428 [Peer Reviewed Journal], CONICET Digital (CONICET), Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas, instacron:CONICET, MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY (ISSN 0035-8711)
- Publication Year :
- 2017
-
Abstract
- The scaling of disk galaxy rotation velocity with baryonic mass (the "Baryonic Tully-Fisher" relation, BTF) has long confounded galaxy formation models. It is steeper than the M ~ V^3 scaling relating halo virial masses and circular velocities and its zero point implies that galaxies comprise a very small fraction of available baryons. Such low galaxy formation efficiencies may in principle be explained by winds driven by evolving stars, but the tightness of the BTF relation argues against the substantial scatter expected from such vigorous feedback mechanism. We use the APOSTLE/EAGLE simulations to show that the BTF relation is well reproduced in LCDM simulations that match the size and number of galaxies as a function of stellar mass. In such models, galaxy rotation velocities are proportional to halo virial velocity and the steep velocity-mass dependence results from the decline in galaxy formation efficiency with decreasing halo mass needed to reconcile the CDM halo mass function with the galaxy luminosity function. Despite the strong feedback, the scatter in the simulated BTF is smaller than observed, even when considering all simulated galaxies and not just rotationally-supported ones. The simulations predict that the BTF should become increasingly steep at the faint end, although the velocity scatter at fixed mass should remain small. Observed galaxies with rotation speeds below ~40 km/s seem to deviate from this prediction. We discuss observational biases and modeling uncertainties that may help to explain this disagreement in the context of LCDM models of dwarf galaxy formation.<br />Comment: 10 pages, 7 figures, submitted to MNRAS
- Subjects :
- DWARF GALAXIES
Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics (astro-ph.CO)
SIMULATING GALACTIC OUTFLOWS
Ciencias Físicas
FOS: Physical sciences
Astrophysics::Cosmology and Extragalactic Astrophysics
Tully–Fisher relation
01 natural sciences
purl.org/becyt/ford/1 [https]
HALOES [GALAXIES]
0103 physical sciences
010303 astronomy & astrophysics
TOO BIG
QC
Astrophysics::Galaxy Astrophysics
QB
EVOLUTION [GALAXIES]
Physics
010308 nuclear & particles physics
Astronomy
Astronomy and Astrophysics
purl.org/becyt/ford/1.3 [https]
H I
115 Astronomy, Space science
Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies
Astronomía
galaxies: haloes
COLD DARK-MATTER
COSMOLOGICAL SIMULATIONS
Space and Planetary Science
STRUCTURE [GALAXIES]
SUPERNOVA FEEDBACK
Astrophysics of Galaxies (astro-ph.GA)
EAGLE SIMULATIONS
galaxies: structure
GALAXY FORMATION
galaxies: evolution
STELLAR MASS
Humanities
CIENCIAS NATURALES Y EXACTAS
Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 00358711
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- NASA Astrophysics Data System, MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY (ISSN 0035-8711), 464(2), 2419-2428, Monthly notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 2017, Vol.464(2), pp.2419-2428 [Peer Reviewed Journal], CONICET Digital (CONICET), Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas, instacron:CONICET, MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY (ISSN 0035-8711)
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....a6c3e86bca02423c0e60a25b428caa90