Back to Search Start Over

Everolimus with Reduced Calcineurin Inhibitor Exposure in Renal Transplantation

Authors :
Pascual, Julio
Berger, Stefan P.
Witzke, Oliver
Tedesco, Helio
Mulgaonkar, Shamkant
Qazi, Yasir
Chadban, Steven
Oppenheimer, Federico
Sommerer, Claudia
Oberbauer, Rainer
Watarai, Yoshihiko
Legendre, Christophe
Citterio, Franco
Henry, Mitchell
Srinivas, Titte R.
Luo, Wen-Lin
Marti, AnaMaria
Bernhardt, Peter
Vincenti, Flavio
on behalf of the TRANSFORM Investigators
Knotek, Mladen
Bašić Jukić, Nikolina
Groningen Kidney Center (GKC)
Groningen Institute for Organ Transplantation (GIOT)
Pascual, Julio
Berger, Stefan P
Witzke, Oliver
Tedesco, Helio
Mulgaonkar, Shamkant
Qazi, Yasir
Chadban, Steven
Oppenheimer, Federico
Sommerer, Claudia
Oberbauer, Rainer
Watarai, Yoshihiko
Legendre, Christophe
Citterio, Franco
Henry, Mitchell
Srinivas, Titte R
Luo, Wen-Lin
Marti, AnaMaria
Bernhardt, Peter
Todeschini Paola
Source :
Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, 29(7), 1979-1991. AMER SOC NEPHROLOGY, Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, 29, 7, pp. 1979-1991, Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, 29, 1979-1991
Publication Year :
2018

Abstract

Background Everolimus permits reduced calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) exposure, but the efficacy and safety outcomes of this treatment after kidney transplant require confirmation.Methods In a multicenter noninferiority trial, we randomized 2037 de novo kidney transplant recipients to receive, in combination with induction therapy and corticosteroids, everolimus with reduced-exposure CNI (everolimus arm) or mycophenolic acid (MPA) with standard-exposure CNI (MPA arm). The primary end point was treated biopsy-proven acute rejection or eGFR Results In the intent-to-treat population (everolimus n=1022, MPA n=1015), the primary end point incidence was 48.2% (493) with everolimus and 45.1% (457) with MPA (difference 3.2%; 95% confidence interval, -1.3% to 7.6%). Similar between-treatment differences in incidence were observed in the subgroups of patients who received tacrolimus or cyclosporine. Treated biopsy-proven acute rejection, graft loss, or death at post-transplant month 12 occurred in 14.9% and 12.5% of patients treated with everolimus and MPA, respectively (difference 2.3%; 95% confidence interval, -1.7% to 6.4%). De novo donor-specific antibody incidence at 12 months and antibody-mediated rejection rate did not differ between arms. Cytomegalovirus (3.6% versus 13.3%) and BK virus infections (4.3% versus 8.0%) were less frequent in the everolimus arm than in the MPA arm. Overall, 23.0% and 11.9% of patients treated with everolimus and MPA, respectively, discontinued the study drug because of adverse events.Conclusions In kidney transplant recipients at mild-to-moderate immunologic risk, everolimus was non-inferior to MPA for a binary composite end point assessing immunosuppressive efficacy and preservation of graft function.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
10466673
Volume :
29
Issue :
7
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....a6cceef4e906f1546614633c9e5427e3