Back to Search Start Over

Are There Clinical Differences in Limited Systemic Sclerosis according to Extension of Skin Involvement?

Authors :
Eliana Lancioni
Luis J. Catoggio
Josefina Marin
Mirtha Sabelli
Marina Scolnik
Carla Saucedo
Enrique R. Soriano
Source :
International Journal of Rheumatology, International Journal of Rheumatology, Vol 2014 (2014)
Publication Year :
2014
Publisher :
Hindawi Limited, 2014.

Abstract

Objectives. To examine the characteristics of our patients with limited systemic sclerosis (lSSc) for differences between Barnett Type 1 (sclerodactyly only) and Type 2 or intermediate (acrosclerosis-distal but may reach up to elbows and/or knees plus face) subsets.Methods. Records of patients between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2011, with SSc or those with anti-Scl-70, anticentromere, or antinucleolar antibodies were reviewed. Only cases fulfilling ACR 1980 criteria were included and classified as diffuse or limited according to LeRoy’s criteria. Limited SSc was separated into sclerodactyly and acrosclerosis (Barnett’s Types 1 and 2).Results. 234 SSc patients (216 females) fulfilled criteria. Female/male ratio was 12 : 1; 24% had dSSc and 76% lSSC (64% Type 1 and 12% Type 2). Total follow-up was 688 patient-years. Within lSSC, the Type 2 group had significantly shorter duration of Raynaud’s and more anti-Scl-70 and less anticentromere antibodies. In particular, interstitial lung disease (ILD) was significantly more prevalent in Type 2 group and similar to Type 3.Conclusions. These results appear to confirm that extension of skin involvement within limited SSc may identify two different subsets with clinical and serologic characteristics.

Details

ISSN :
16879279 and 16879260
Volume :
2014
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
International Journal of Rheumatology
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....a72aa518e0101470ee81e7d6e95e725b
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/716358