Back to Search
Start Over
Understanding inequalities in COVID-19 outcomes following hospital admission for people with intellectual disability compared to the general population: a matched cohort study in the UK
- Source :
- BMJ Open, BMJ Open, Vol 11, Iss 10 (2021)
- Publication Year :
- 2021
- Publisher :
- BMJ Publishing Group, 2021.
-
Abstract
- ObjectivesThis study explores the hospital journey of patients with intellectual disabilities (IDs) compared with the general population after admission for COVID-19 during the first wave of the pandemic (when demand on inpatient resources was high) to identify disparities in treatment and outcomes.DesignMatched cohort study; an ID cohort of 506 patients were matched based on age, sex and ethnicity with a control group using a 1:3 ratio to compare outcomes from the International Severe Acute Respiratory and emerging Infections Consortium WHO Clinical Characterisation Protocol UK.SettingAdmissions for COVID-19 from UK hospitals; data on symptoms, severity, access to interventions, complications, mortality and length of stay were extracted.InterventionsNon-invasive respiratory support, intubation, tracheostomy, ventilation and admission to intensive care units (ICU).ResultsSubjective presenting symptoms such as loss of taste/smell were less frequently reported in ID patients, whereas indicators of more severe disease such as altered consciousness and seizures were more common. Controls had higher rates of cardiovascular risk factors, asthma, rheumatological disorder and smoking. ID patients were admitted with higher respiratory rates (median=22, range=10–48) and were more likely to require oxygen therapy (35.1% vs 28.9%). Despite this, ID patients were 37% (95% CI 13% to 57%) less likely to receive non-invasive respiratory support, 40% (95% CI 7% to 63%) less likely to receive intubation and 50% (95% CI 30% to 66%) less likely to be admitted to the ICU while in hospital. They had a 56% (95% CI 17% to 102%) increased risk of dying from COVID-19 after they were hospitalised and were dying 1.44 times faster (95% CI 1.13 to 1.84) compared with controls.ConclusionsThere have been significant disparities in healthcare between people with ID and the general population during the COVID-19 pandemic, which may have contributed to excess mortality in this group.
- Subjects :
- intensive & critical care
medicine.medical_specialty
medicine.medical_treatment
Population
Psychological intervention
Global Health
Cohort Studies
03 medical and health sciences
0302 clinical medicine
Oxygen therapy
Intensive care
Intellectual Disability
Intellectual disability
medicine
Humans
030212 general & internal medicine
education
Pandemics
Asthma
education.field_of_study
business.industry
SARS-CoV-2
public health
COVID-19
General Medicine
medicine.disease
Hospitals
United Kingdom
3. Good health
Cohort
Emergency medicine
Medicine
business
030217 neurology & neurosurgery
Cohort study
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 20446055
- Volume :
- 11
- Issue :
- 10
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- BMJ Open
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....a7d313afa4b24db388b4bc9cb4a1e3f0