Back to Search Start Over

Management of Primary Retroperitoneal Sarcoma (RPS) in the Adult: An Updated Consensus Approach from the Transatlantic Australasian RPS Working Group

Authors :
John E. Mullinax
Mark Fairweather
Rebecca A. Gladdy
David E. Gyorki
Eberhard Stoeckle
Deanna Ng
Carol J. Swallow
Andrew J. Hayes
Robin L. Jones
Ricardo J. Gonzalez
Dirk C. Strauss
Winan J. van Houdt
Samuel J Ford
Chandrajit P. Raut
Dario Callegaro
Marco Fiore
Markus Albertsmeier
Hayden Snow
Piotr Rutkowski
Carolyn Nessim
Kenneth Cardona
Silvia Stacchiotti
D Tzanis
Thomas F. DeLaney
Sylvie Bonvalot
Jacek Skoczylas
Myles Smith
T Bouhadiba
Jae Berm Park
Alessandro Gronchi
Christina L. Roland
Anant Desai
Rick L. Haas
Source :
Ann Surg Oncol
Publication Year :
2021
Publisher :
Springer Science and Business Media LLC, 2021.

Abstract

BACKGROUND. Retroperitoneal soft tissue sarcomas comprise a heterogeneous group of rare tumors of mesenchymal origin that include several well-defined histologic subtypes. In 2015, the Transatlantic Australasian RPS Working Group (TARPSWG) published consensus recommendations for the best management of primary retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS). Since then, through international collaboration, new evidence and knowledge have been generated, creating the need for an updated consensus document. METHODS. The primary aim of this study was to critically evaluate the current evidence and develop an up-to-date consensus document on the approach to these difficult tumors. The resulting document applies to primary RPS that is non-visceral in origin, with exclusion criteria as previously described. The relevant literature was evaluated and an international group of experts consulted to formulate consensus statements regarding the best management of primary RPS. A level of evidence and grade of recommendation were attributed to each new/updated recommendation. RESULTS. Management of primary RPS was considered from diagnosis to follow-up. This rare and complex malignancy is best managed by an experienced multidisciplinary team in a specialized referral center. The best chance of cure is at the time of primary presentation, and an individualized management plan should be made based on the 29 consensus statements included in this article, which were agreed upon by all of the authors. Whenever possible, patients should be enrolled in prospective trials and studies. CONCLUSIONS. Ongoing international collaboration is critical to expand upon current knowledge and further improve outcomes of patients with RPS. In addition, prospective data collection and participation in multi-institution trials are strongly encouraged.

Details

ISSN :
15344681 and 10689265
Volume :
28
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Annals of Surgical Oncology
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....a83d01ec1313b3360b2b9e604aec4350